Nevill
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2009
- Messages
- 11,211
Ok, I think this deserves a in-depth responce.
I always play a risky game, trying to provoke enough people that the killers would throw in their vote, hoping to score a free day, but not collecting enough to actually get hanged. So being accused is nothing new to me.
However, this particular case doesn't sit well with me, because the logic you use suggests that if I am a killer, I am both extremely cunning and as dumb as a brick.
I'll say this right now - killing Viata was a dumb move. The guy was muddling the waters during the first game so well, no one knew what side he was on at the end of the day. Well, the killers did, which is probably why they left him alive as a part of the plot to have me hanged. He serves as a good smoke cover, and that alone favors leaving him alive for last.
But if I were a killer, offing Viata would be twice as dumb. After being goaded and being tricked into accusing me several times (something that a bear named spigot planned to use), he would be much less trigger happy seeing my usual behavior that rubbed him the wrong way first time. Killing him would be depriving myself of one of the possible allies, of those who would not be so gung-ho about lynching me as the others. It makes zero sense fo me to kill him.
Unless, of course, the goal is to rob me of supporters.
It is the very same method the killers used during the first game. spigot accused me and taxalot, saying that one of us was the killer, and then offed taxalot to vote for me the next day, because he was 'sure' I am a suspect.
So you see this is a set up, you even admit it is a very obvious set up. I already have most of the people voting for me during the first day, I would make for a good target during the second one. And the less people would raise any kind of objection, the better. Our debates with Viata got a bit heated the last time, so there is also a personal motive to attach to the deed.
And you still fall for it because it must be some kind of Kunning Kodexian plot where I kill the very people I might need alive to stay in the game.
I do think that you are innocent (and probably Grimgravy, too) so I am sad to see that you can be so easily swayed. If this gets traction, the murderers need only to cast a single vote and then pretend they were clueless.
I always play a risky game, trying to provoke enough people that the killers would throw in their vote, hoping to score a free day, but not collecting enough to actually get hanged. So being accused is nothing new to me.
However, this particular case doesn't sit well with me, because the logic you use suggests that if I am a killer, I am both extremely cunning and as dumb as a brick.
I'll say this right now - killing Viata was a dumb move. The guy was muddling the waters during the first game so well, no one knew what side he was on at the end of the day. Well, the killers did, which is probably why they left him alive as a part of the plot to have me hanged. He serves as a good smoke cover, and that alone favors leaving him alive for last.
But if I were a killer, offing Viata would be twice as dumb. After being goaded and being tricked into accusing me several times (something that a bear named spigot planned to use), he would be much less trigger happy seeing my usual behavior that rubbed him the wrong way first time. Killing him would be depriving myself of one of the possible allies, of those who would not be so gung-ho about lynching me as the others. It makes zero sense fo me to kill him.
Unless, of course, the goal is to rob me of supporters.
It is the very same method the killers used during the first game. spigot accused me and taxalot, saying that one of us was the killer, and then offed taxalot to vote for me the next day, because he was 'sure' I am a suspect.
So you see this is a set up, you even admit it is a very obvious set up. I already have most of the people voting for me during the first day, I would make for a good target during the second one. And the less people would raise any kind of objection, the better. Our debates with Viata got a bit heated the last time, so there is also a personal motive to attach to the deed.
And you still fall for it because it must be some kind of Kunning Kodexian plot where I kill the very people I might need alive to stay in the game.
I do think that you are innocent (and probably Grimgravy, too) so I am sad to see that you can be so easily swayed. If this gets traction, the murderers need only to cast a single vote and then pretend they were clueless.
I know you are trying to 'make a case', and throw everything into the mix, but at least stick to the facts. We've all eaten Viata stew together.
You add @ in front of their username.
Last edited:
