Chris Priestly said:In the full version of Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, players obtain Reinforcement Packs using credits earned while playing the game. These packs may include weapons, upgrades, consumables and new characters to play. Based on player feedback during the demo period, the drop rate for rare race/class combinations and weapons has been improved.
For players who do not wish to spend time earning these multiplayer credits through matches, they will have the option to purchase certain packs through real currency. Our goal is to allow all Mass Effect 3 players the ability to experience the best equipment, characters, etc in multiplayer regardless of how much time they have to spend.
Oh boy...
http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/347/index/9638532
Chris Priestly said:In the full version of Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, players obtain Reinforcement Packs using credits earned while playing the game. These packs may include weapons, upgrades, consumables and new characters to play. Based on player feedback during the demo period, the drop rate for rare race/class combinations and weapons has been improved.
For players who do not wish to spend time earning these multiplayer credits through matches, they will have the option to purchase certain packs through real currency. Our goal is to allow all Mass Effect 3 players the ability to experience the best equipment, characters, etc in multiplayer regardless of how much time they have to spend.
Why isn't thee an option to murder both races?
Quarians: Whiny fuckers who are terminally ill anyway.
Geth: Whiny fucktards who has the potential to become the next Reapers.
SV Shepard would have corrupted the upload, shot Tali in the face and then watched as the Geth killed the Quarians and then self-destructed.
Voice acting would cost too much.Why isn't thee an option to murder both races?
Quarians: Whiny fuckers who are terminally ill anyway.
Geth: Whiny fucktards who has the potential to become the next Reapers.
SV Shepard would have corrupted the upload, shot Tali in the face and then watched as the Geth killed the Quarians and then self-destructed.
If you think that this kind of set up was possible in KOTOR you will realize how much they have gone down the dunghill.Why isn't thee an option to murder both races?
Quarians: Whiny fuckers who are terminally ill anyway.
Geth: Whiny fucktards who has the potential to become the next Reapers.
SV Shepard would have corrupted the upload, shot Tali in the face and then watched as the Geth killed the Quarians and then self-destructed.
That's what I was thinking.
The best part is that they completely fuck up even a basic suicide scene by leaving it to focus on Shepard leaning over the cliff, looking like he smelled something mildly unpleasant.
Because organics and synthetics can never get along, duh.
Why isn't thee an option to murder both races?
Quarians: Whiny fuckers who are terminally ill anyway.
Geth: Whiny fucktards who has the potential to become the next Reapers.
SV Shepard would have corrupted the upload, shot Tali in the face and then watched as the Geth killed the Quarians and then self-destructed.
Judging by what's been said in this thread, you can! First, murder the Quarians, then, choose the Destroy All Synthetics ending option and voila.
When I designed current tech ship it was about
Well there was that famous incident when two SSBNs hit each other because they both found a nice spot for loitering, and both moved in from different directions.
There are more decoys than torpedoes that can be used against SSN before SSN would manage to strike back.
I remember some person who said he was flying about 13 hours or so without interruption.
well there is third choice where you do exactly what you said. save both races, its just harder to get. just sayin
That boils down to an individual engagement then, more than a general rule, I'd say though I'm no expert of sub warfare. In any case, it doesn't really change my point which was that submarines firing torpedoes are not more visible than air planes firing missiles.
Well, I didn't intend to mean that a single little breach will immediately mean the destruction of either a sub or a space craft but that the tolerances are much closer to each other there than when comparing surface navies or air planes. Plus, even if the ship sinks, you still have lifeboats. If your submarine sinks, everyone dies - pretty much like in a space craft. Sure, you could install some sorts of lifepods but with the distances involved and the potential destructive energy of engines/magazines cooking off, I'd wager they would be as useful as that "escape door" in a sub.
Well, my point still stands - when was the last time even a B-52 or B-2 bomber undertook a 130 day mission? Never. Hence my argument that submarines are closer to any future space "navy" than the air force.
With satellite topography, navigational aids and AWACS support, I'd prefer to have rested pilot than one who has just flown in that area but that's just me. I don't know the operational doctrine of USAF, though I guess we have both read the same stories about Kwa pilots flying way too long in a row, pumped up with drugs to stay "sharp". And then end up bombing a wedding or something.
