Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Codex Review TC Review: Warhammer 40k: Armageddon

Whisky

The Solution
Joined
Feb 22, 2012
Messages
8,555
Location
Banjoville, British Columbia
Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera
Tags: Flashback Games; Slitherine; Warhammer 40,000: Armageddon


Faithful poster and contributor Darth Roxor got a chance to play Warhammer 40k: Armageddon. He was so moved by the content of it that he felt the need to write up a review.

At first glance, Armageddon looks like your typical Panzer General game. You have your hexes, your multitude of units in squads of various types and sizes, a top-down view on the strategic map, etc. But the game also brings some additions to the formula, and I honestly can’t say that any of them are very good.

Perhaps the biggest difference, which also influences a lot of further negative aspects of the game, is the lack of the soft/hard target distinction for units. Everything just has a single defensive value simply called “armour”, which is also why the overall damage model is different as well. To do any harm, an attacker’s weapon must cause more damage than the armour value of the defender – the damage roll has many factors to it, such as the cover level of the enemy, the line of sight obstruction provided by certain hexes, the unit’s inherent accuracy, the loss of accuracy per tile, the armour piercing value of the weapon and the amount of shots a unit fires when it attacks. There are a lot of somewhat vague variables at work here, and they lead to a ton of rather unnecessary randomness that can influence the attack roll in both ways and lead to hilariously unexpected results.​

Read the full article: TC Review: Warhammer 40k: Armageddon
 

rezaf

Cipher
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
650
While I fnd myself forced to agree with the general concensus of the review, there's a few occasions where it looks like the reviewer didn't do his homework.
For example, the concept of injuries vs. kills was never a Panzer General thing, was it? It was in Fantasy Wars, and it's a neat concept that I'd like to have seen replicated, but it never was in PG, iirc?

The reviewer claims there were no proper Panzer General clones and then, a couple of lines down, mentions Panzer Corps, which followed Panzer General Forever, a freeware PG remake that got PzC's developer - who now made WH:A - started in this business.
I'm pretty fond of Panzer Corps (and everyone looking for a PG revival should definately play it over WH:A) and what disappointed me the most about this game was how many systems that were proven to work from earlier games were thrown out and replaced by new mechanics that immediately started to show their own set of flaws many of which are yet to be rectified. The review mentions some of them. I can't help to feel as if many things were also dumbed down, but maybe that's just me.

Anyway, thanks for the review.
_____
rezaf
 

Darth Roxor

Royal Dongsmith
Staff Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
1,878,405
Location
Djibouti
For example, the concept of injuries vs. kills was never a Panzer General thing, was it? It was in Fantasy Wars, and it's a neat concept that I'd like to have seen replicated, but it never was in PG, iirc?

They were not in PG1, yes, but I think I distinctly remember them appearing in PG2? Fantasy General and Rites of War def had them as well.

The reviewer claims there were no proper Panzer General clones and then, a couple of lines down, mentions Panzer Corps, which followed Panzer General Forever

Like I said, I gullibly assumed they suck :troll:
 

rezaf

Cipher
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
650
They were not in PG1, yes, but I think I distinctly remember them appearing in PG2? Fantasy General and Rites of War def had them as well.

Ah, thanks for the clarification.
Speaking of which, Age of Wonders has citybuilding, doesn't it suck that it's missing from WH:A? :P

Like I said, I gullibly assumed they suck

If you like(d) PG you should give Panzer Corps a whirl, it's a much better game than WH:A. Get the Afrika Korps standalone thingy for a good introduction and disable the 1.21 rules in the options.
_____
rezaf
 

Cyberarmy

Love fool
Patron
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
8,451
Location
Smyrna - Scalanouva
Divinity: Original Sin 2
Nice review,sadly Games Workshop not really care about the quality of WH40K games so we'll keep getting medicore games like this.
Or shitty phone/tablet games...
 

Galdred

Studio Draconis
Patron
Developer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
4,346
Location
Middle Empire
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I think the game suffers mostly from its identity crisis :
It tries to be both a tactical game and a Panzer General successor, but PzG was meant to be an operational game. Many of the abstractions do not work at all when they are not abstracted anymore :
Trying to model every weapon in an unit while retaining PzG mechanism, without going the extra mile to allow different profiles in the units (like The operational Art of War, or Advanced Tactics did) leads to disaster.
I liked the first act, but the last 2 ones illustrate how the game system falls apart when you introduce super heavies and titans.
What makes me sad is the little work that would be required to turn this into a quasi adaptation of epic 40k :
quadrupling all weapon ranges (but not movement), adding overwatch, removing retaliation, and reworking the weapon strength and unit armor values would be enough.
It could even be modded except for 2 items : the overwatch, and the range.
No overwatch would not be a big problem (Space Marines which was the previous edition of epic 40K before being named so) didn't have overwatch), but the 4 range limit (every shot over range 4 counts as indirect, and doesn't need LoS) is criminal, as it makes it impossible to mod the game into something else, for no good reason.
 

Darth Roxor

Royal Dongsmith
Staff Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
1,878,405
Location
Djibouti
Darth Roxor just hates everything now, because he is bitter about Blackguards 2.

img-2.gif
 

Archibald

Arcane
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Messages
7,869
I haven't played the game, but couldn't many of the flaws (mainly stats/balance things) mentioned in the review get fixed in patch or some mod by fans?
 

Darth Roxor

Royal Dongsmith
Staff Member
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
1,878,405
Location
Djibouti
I haven't played the game, but couldn't many of the flaws (mainly stats/balance things) mentioned in the review get fixed in patch or some mod by fans?

I really don't think so. A lot of what is wrong about this game can be attributed to the long ranges that every unit has, and it's kind of a vicious cycle.

Long ranges mean you have to abuse artillery or any of your units that get spotted by the enemy will get bumrushed and de-rezzed by a whole horde of ork tanks that also have long ranges.

But if you get rid of the long ranges and adjust it to 'pg levels', you'll then get fucked by the map design's constant overreliance on chokepoints that will force you into attacking with like one or two units per turn while the rest of your army stands back twiddling their thumbs. Bonus points if the target is further blocked off and immune to attacks by LOS-blocking obstacles.

The game would need some sort of a total overhaul to salvage it. Just fixing the numbers would fix maybe half of its flaws, but I don't think it would make it very enjoyable regardless.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom