Tacticular Cancer: We'll have your balls

  1. Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
    Dismiss Notice

Stellaris - Paradox new sci-fi grand strategy game

Discussion in 'Strategy Gaming' started by Perkel, Aug 6, 2015.

  1. `Helliongender: ⚧ Learned

    `Hellion
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2013
    Parrots:
    269
    Click here and disable ads!
    According to a new post on ther FB page, their team is experimenting with "environmental hazards" now.


    [​IMG]
     
    • incline incline x 4
    ^ Top  
  2. MadMaxHellfiregender: ⚧ Magister

    MadMaxHellfire
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Parrots:
    2,876
    Location:
    Italy
    for now, the game needs two things:
    1) competitive tall empires, science fiction is full of single systems/single planets unconquerable races
    2) defense wins over attack, and ground troops have the final word on wars, as long as you can't set foot on enemy ground you're losing badly
    after this has been established, the final touch is a more fluid diplomacy. right now diplomacy is set in stone, tied to your traits and governments. stellaris needs powerful diplomacy treaties and more modifiers akin to eu4's.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    ^ Top  
  3. Endemicgender: ⚧ Prophet

    Endemic
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Parrots:
    1,166
    Planetary shields and surface gun batteries could help with that.
     
    ^ Top  
  4. Mortmalgender: ⚧ Arcane

    Mortmal
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Parrots:
    4,182
    Thats what i'd like to see too, one planet empire with super high tech , small fleets battling against huge fleets of rusty slaver ships..But it seems they are scared to make tech matters, right now if you try to play tall you will lag behind in everything and be slightly ahead in tech with most option being to research weapons and stuff you dont need , at the very best +5% fire rate.Itkills replayability the only way to play is expand as much as possible and not caring about anything.
     
    ^ Top  
  5. Make America Great Again Average Manateegender: ⚧ Prestigious Gentleman Arcane

    Average Manatee
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Parrots:
    8,226
    The last thing a 4x game needs is to punish expansion. Tech penalties for size are a horrible band-aid.

    I mean, does anyone actually just stay with 5 or so planets for decades and pretend that its thrilling gameplay? Sure, you can pull off exploitative shit where you vassalize half the galaxy while staying small, but that's precisely an exploit and not what the game should be about.
     
    ^ Top  
  6. Mortmalgender: ⚧ Arcane

    Mortmal
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Parrots:
    4,182
    Fast breeder+more mineral traits, expand , if you get tech fine, if you dont no big deal , amass a doom stack of shitty ships you autofit , congrats you have won stellaris, not really thrilling , it requires a bit more diversity.
     
    ^ Top  
  7. Make America Great Again Average Manateegender: ⚧ Prestigious Gentleman Arcane

    Average Manatee
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Parrots:
    8,226
    If tech mattered even a little in Stellaris the optimal move would be to vassalize your immediate neighbors and then do nothing for 50 years. At least expanding gives you stuff to click on.
     
    ^ Top  
  8. whatevernamegender: ⚧ Erudite

    whatevername
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Parrots:
    666
    Location:
    666
    I actually stayed with 1 planet for decades and didn't pretend that it's thrilling gameplay. Didn't vassalize anyone though since I assumed all these retarded AIs would be a huge liability.

    This is what tech gets you.
    [​IMG]
     
    ^ Top  
  9. Make America Great Again Average Manateegender: ⚧ Prestigious Gentleman Arcane

    Average Manatee
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Parrots:
    8,226
    Yes, we all know it's easy to abuse the AI in Stellaris. Thanks for reminding us.
     
    ^ Top  
  10. Mortmalgender: ⚧ Arcane

    Mortmal
    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Parrots:
    4,182
    Yes cause vassals interactions are too simplistic , if you could reorganize their tiles, placing your own enclave on strategic ressources, have to deal with politics, spying, assasination of leaders etc.. you would have more things to click.Anyway it always come to the point stellaris is their most mainstream thing and it lacks of depth.
     
    ^ Top  
  11. whatevernamegender: ⚧ Erudite

    whatevername
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Parrots:
    666
    Location:
    666
    Can you clarify what's called "AI abuse"? Shields IV or a 86-strong fleet butchering a 121-strong rust bucket fleet without losses? Or being fanatic xenophile pacifist?
     
    ^ Top  
  12. thesheeepgender: ⚧ Arcane

    thesheeep
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Parrots:
    5,820
    Location:
    Tampere, Finland
    Playing the game efficiently instead of LARPing your space empire is considered "AI abuse". And rude.
    Say that you are sorry.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    ^ Top  
  13. Space Satangender: ⚧ Arcane

    Space Satan
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Parrots:
    2,986
    Location:
    Space Hell
    It reeks of Warhammer 40k: Battlefleet Gothic's Celestial Phenomena
     
    ^ Top  
  14. Make America Great Again Average Manateegender: ⚧ Prestigious Gentleman Arcane

    Average Manatee
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Parrots:
    8,226
    More like the AI doesn't understand how to choose weapons/ship types properly and therefore automatically loses in any engagement after Cruisers.
     
    ^ Top  
  15. Space Satangender: ⚧ Arcane

    Space Satan
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Parrots:
    2,986
    Location:
    Space Hell
    With upcoming FTL rework this seems to be a new wormhole...or not
    [​IMG]
     
    • Fabulously Optimistic Fabulously Optimistic x 1
    ^ Top  
  16. Space Satangender: ⚧ Arcane

    Space Satan
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Parrots:
    2,986
    Location:
    Space Hell
    We Master of Orion II now
    [​IMG]
     
    • incline incline x 1
    ^ Top  
  17. orcinatorgender: ⚧ Learned

    orcinator
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2016
    Parrots:
    421
    Location:
    Republic of Kongou
    But then only one fleet will get the +13% damage boost from a max level commander.

    Okay maybe it's a bit higher, but it's still overshadowed by the -66% reduction in damage thanks to wedge formation.
     
    ^ Top  
  18. Space Satangender: ⚧ Arcane

    Space Satan
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Parrots:
    2,986
    Location:
    Space Hell
    Good riddance!
     
    • incline incline x 3
    ^ Top  
  19. Space Satangender: ⚧ Arcane

    Space Satan
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Parrots:
    2,986
    Location:
    Space Hell
    DD: FTL rework
    Show Spoiler

    Hello everyone and welcome to another Stellaris development diary. Today's dev diary is about Faster than Light travel in the Cherryh update, and it's likely to be a controversial one. When discussing, please remember to keep things civil, and I would kindly ask that you read the entire dev diary before rushing to post, as it's going to cover some of the questions and concerns we expect to see from the playerbase. Also, as posted last week, all of these changes are currently far away, and we cannot give more details on ETAs or the exact nature of the Cherryh update than we already have. Thank you!

    FTL Rework
    The single biggest design issue we have had to tackle in the Stellaris team since release is the asymmetrical FTL. While it's a cool and interesting idea on paper, the honest truth is that the feature just does not fit well into the game in practice, and blocks numerous improvements on a myriad of other features such as warfare and exploration, as well as solutions to fundamental design problems like the weakness of static defenses. After a lot of debate among the designers, we finally decided that if we were ever going to be able to tackle these issues and turn Stellaris into a game with truly engrossing and interesting warfare, we would have to bite the bullet and take a controversial decision: Consolidating FTL from the current three types down into a primarily hyperlane-based game, with more advanced forms of FTL unlocked through technology.

    However, as I have said on the previous occasions when discussing this issue, one thing we would never consider doing is just slashing FTL types from the game without adding in something else to compensate their loss. That is what most of this dev diary is going to be about. However, before continuing with the details on the additions and changes we're making to FTL, I want to cover a couple of the questions I expect will arise from this:

    Why are you removing FTL choices instead of building on them?
    A lot of people have asked this question when we have brought up consolidating FTL types before, suggesting that problems such as static defenses can be solved by just adding more mechanics to handle each special case. I think the problem with this is best illustrated with defense stations and FTL inhibitors. One of the aims of the Starbase system is to give empires the ability to 'lock down' their borders, building fortresses that enemy fleets cannot simply skip past to strike at their core worlds, instead of having to create static defenses in every single valuable system.

    With hyperlanes, this is a pretty simple affair: As hyperlanes create natural choke points, the only thing a hyperlane-stopping FTL inhibitor needs to do is to prevent enemy fleets from leaving the system once they enter it. The fleet can enter, it can retreat (via emergency FTL) and it can bring down the source of the FTL inhibitor (which might be a Starbase or even a planet) to be able to continue. This is quite easy to understand, both in terms of which system you need to defend to lock down your borders, and how it works when you are on the offensive.

    Now let's add Warp to the mix. In this case, the single-system FTL inhibitor is useless because Warp fleets can just go over it, so we'll invent another mechanic: A warp interdiction bubble, stretching a certain distance around the system, that pull in any hostile Warp fleets traveling there to the system containing the FTL inhibitor, and force them to battle it or retreat. This is immediately a lot more messy: First of all, this bubble can't possibly affect Hyperlane fleets, because it could potentially pull them dozens of jumps away from their current location. This means that when fortifying your borders, you now need to not just make sure that every important chokepoint is covered, but also that your entire border is covered in warp interdiction bubbles.

    But there's more: Add Wormholes as well, and you now have an FTL type where not only the 'bubble' type interdictor doesn't make intuitive sense (because Wormhole fleets make point-to-point jumps rather than traveling over the map) but if said interdictor works to pull Wormhole fleets out of position regardless of what makes intuitive sense, you end up with the same probem as with hyperlanes, where the fleet can get pulled out of range of its wormhole network and end up stranded even if it brings down the defenses. This means you pretty much have to invent a third type of interdiction type for Wormhole on top of what is already an overengineered and hard to understand system.

    Finally, add the problem of displaying all these different types of inhibitors and interdictors on the map, in a way that the player can even remotely start to understand, and you end up with nothing short of a complete mess, where it's far better to just have static defenses protecting single valuable systems... and so we come full circle.

    This is the fundamental problem that we have been grappling with when it comes to asymmetrical FTL: What works in a game such as Sword of the Stars, with its turn-based gameplay, small maps of usually no more than 3-6 empires, and 1-on-1 wars breaks down completely in a Stellaris game with real-time gameplay and wars potentially containing a dozen actors, all with their own form of FTL. The complexity collapses into what is for the player just a mess of fleets appearing and disappearing with no discernible logic to them.

    Why Hyperlanes?
    When discussing this, we essentially boiled down the consolidation into three possibilities: Hyperlanes only, Warp-only, and Warp+Hyperlanes. Wormhole is simply too different a FTL type to ever really work with the others, and not intuitive enough to work as the sole starting FTL for everyone playing the game. Keeping both Warp and Hyperlanes would be an improvement, but would still keep many of the issues we currently have in regards to user experience and fleet coordination. Warp-only was considered as an alternative, but ultimately Hyperlanes won out because of the possibilities it opens up for galactic geography, static defenses and enhancements to exploration.

    Here are the some of the possibilities that consolidation of FTL into Hyperlanes creates for Stellaris:
    • Unified distance, sensor and border systems that make sense for everyone (for example, cost of claiming a system not being based on euclidean distance but rather the actual distance for ships to travel there)
    • Galactic 'geography', systems that are strategically and tactically important due to location and 'terrain' (more on this below) rather than just resources
    • More possibilities for galaxy generation and exploration (for example, entire regions of space accessible only through a wormhole or a single guarded hyperlane, containing special locations and events to discover)
    • Better performance through caching and unified code (Wormhole FTL in particular is a massive resource hog in the late game)
    • Warfare with a distinct sense of 'theatres', advancing/retreating fronts and border skirmishes (more on this in future dev diaries)
    Are all new forms of FTL free patch content?
    Yes. Naturally we're not going to charge for any form of content meant to replace the loss of old FTL types.

    Hyperlane and Sublight Travel
    As mentioned, in the Cherryh update. all empires will now start the game with Hyperlanes as their only mode of FTL. By default, hyperlane generation is going to be changed to create more 'islands' and 'choke points', to make for more interesting galactic geography. However, as we know some players do not enjoy the idea of constricted space, we are going to add a slider that controls the general frequency and connectivity of hyperlanes. Turning this up will create a more connected galaxy and make it harder to protect all your systems with static defenses, for players who prefer something closer to the current game's Warp-style movement.

    Sublight travel is also being changed somewhat, in the sense that you need to actually travel to the entry point to a particular hyperlane (the arrow inside a system) to enter it, rather than being able to enter any hyperlane from any point outside's a system's gravity well. This means that fleets will move in a more predictable fashion, and interdictions will frequently happen inside systems instead of nearly always being at the edge of them, in particular allowing for fleets to 'guard' important hyperlane entry/exit points. To compensate for the need to move across systems, sublight travel has been sped up, especially with more advanced forms of thrusters.
    [​IMG]

    FTL Sensors
    Along with the change to FTL, we are also changing the way sensors work. Instead of simply being a circle radiating an arbitrary distance from a ship, station or planet, each level of sensors can now see a certain distance in FTL connections. For example, a ship with level 1 sensors (Radar) will only give sensor coverage of the same system that it is currently in, while a ship with level 2 (Gravitic) sensors will give sensor coverage of that system and all systems connected to it through a Hyperlane or explored Wormhole (more on that below), a ship with level 3 sensors will be able to see systems connected to those systems, and so on. Sensor coverage can be 'blocked' by certain galactic features (more on that below), which will also block propagation into further connected systems. We are currently discussing the implementation of sensor blockers as a potential Starbase component.
    [​IMG]

    Wormholes
    While Wormhole as a full-fledged FTL type is gone, Wormholes are not. Instead they have been changed into a natural formation that can be encountered while exploring the galaxy. Wormholes come in pairs, essentially functioning as very long hyperlanes that can potentially take a ship across the entire galaxy near-instantly. Natural Wormholes are unstable, and wen first encountered, you will not be able to explore them. To explore a Wormhole, you need the Wormhole Stabilization technology, after which a science ship can be sent to stabilize and chart the Wormhole to find out what lies on the other side. If you're lucky, this may be unclaimed space full of valuable systems, but it could just as well be a Devouring Swarm eager to come over for dinner. There is a slider on game setup that controls the frequency of wormhole pairs in the galaxy.
    [​IMG]

    Gateways
    Gateways is an advanced form of FTL most closely resembling the Wormhole FTL in the live version of the game. While exploring the galaxy, you can find abandoned Gateways that were once part of a massive, galaxy-spanning network. These Gateways are disabled and unusable, but with the Gateway Reactivation mid-game technology and a hefty investment of minerals, they can be restored to working order. Like Wormholes, Gateways allow for near-instant travel to other Gateways, but the difference is that any activated Gateway can be used to travel to any other activated Gateway, and late-game technology allows for the construction of more Gateways to expand the network. Also unlike Wormholes, which cannot be 'closed', Gateways also have the advantage of allowing any empire controlling the system they're in to control who goes through said Gateway - hostile empires and empires to whom you have closed your borders will not be able to use 'your' Gateways to just appear inside of your systems.

    When the first Gateway is re-activated, another random Gateway will also be re-activated along with it, so that there is never a situation where you just have a single active Gateway going nowhere. There is a slider on game setup that controls the frequency of abandoned gateways in the galaxy.
    [​IMG]

    Jump Drives
    Jump Drives and Psi Jump Drives have been changed, and is now an advanced form of FTL that mixes Hyperdrive with some functionality from the old Warp FTL. They allow for a ship to travel normally and very quickly along hyperlanes, but also come equipped with a tactical 'jump' functionality that allows a fleet to make a point-to-point jump ignoring the normal hyperlane limitations. This is done with a special fleet order where you select a target system for the jump (within a certain pre-defined range, with Psi Jump Drives having longer range than regular Jump Drives), after which the fleet charges up its jump drive and creates a temporary wormhole leading to the system. After the fleet makes its 'jump', the Jump Drive will need to recharge, with a significant cooldown before it can be used again, and also applies a debuff to the fleet that reduces its combat effectiveness while the cooldown is in effect. This allows for fleets with Jump Drives to ignore the usual FTL restrictions and skip straight past enemy fleets and stations, but at the cost of leaving themselves vulnerable and potentially stranded for a time afterwards. This design is highly experimental, and may change during the development of Cherryh, but we wanted Jump Drives to not just be 'Hyperdrive IV' but rather to unlock new tactical and strategic possibilities for warfare.

    Galactic Terrain
    With the switch to Hyperlanes and the creation of strategically important systems and chokepoints, we've also decided to implement something we had always thought was a really interesting idea, but which made little sense without such chokepoints: Galactic Terrain. Specifically, systems with environmental effects and hazards that have profound tactical and strategic effects on ships on empires. This is still something we are in the middle of testing and prototyping, but so far we have created the following forms of Galactic Terrain:
    Nebulas block all sensor coverage originating from other systems, meaning that it's impossible for an empire to see what ships and stations are inside a system in a nebula without having a ship or station stationed there, allowing empires to hide their fleets and set up ambushes.
    Pulsars interfere with deflector technology, nullifying all ship and station shields in a system with a Pulsar.
    Neutron Stars interfere with navigation and ship systems, significantly slowing down sublight travel in a system with a Neutron Star.
    Black Holes interfere with FTL, increasing the time it takes for a fleet to charge its emergency FTL and making it more difficult to ships to individually disengage from combat (more on this in a later dev diary).

    The above is just a first iteration, and it's something we're likely to tweak and build on more for both the Cherryh update and other updates beyond it, so stay tuned for more information on this.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    That's all for today! I will finish this dev diary by saying that we do not expect everyone to be happy with these changes, but we truly believe that they are necessary to give Stellaris truly great warfare, and that we think you will find the game better for it once you get a chance to try them. We will be doing a Design Corner feature on today's Extraterrestial Thursday stream, where me and Game Designer Daniel Moregård (grekulf) will be discussing the changes, fielding questions and showing off some gameplay in the internal development build. If you want a look at some of these changes in a live game environment, be sure to tune to the Paradox Interactive twitch channel at 4pm CET.

    Next week, we're going to talk about war and peace, including the complete rework of the current wargoal system that was made possible by the changes to FTL and system control discussed in this and last week's dev diary. See you then!
     
    • incline incline x 2
    • decline decline x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    ^ Top  
  20. Jimmiousgender: ⚧ Magister

    Jimmious
    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Parrots:
    2,659
    I like this a lot. While the different FTL types were interesting in theory, in practice it was chaotic and non-sensical most of the times. Also:
    Aawww yis
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    ^ Top  
  21. Space Satangender: ⚧ Arcane

    Space Satan
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Parrots:
    2,986
    Location:
    Space Hell
    Stellaris is slowly shaping into something playable
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    ^ Top  
  22. Make America Great Again Average Manateegender: ⚧ Prestigious Gentleman Arcane

    Average Manatee
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Parrots:
    8,226
    Shame that the most unique FTL gets thrown away. Though it was shit to play as (needing to split fleets into 50 groups in order to transit quickly).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    ^ Top  
  23. Prebengender: ⚧ Literate

    Preben
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2017
    Parrots:
    14
    Yep, as usual. Every Paradox game becomes playable 2 years after release. After another 2 years they become unplayable again due to feature bloat and performance drop.
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
    • Agree Agree x 3
    ^ Top  
  24. Gaius maximusgender: ⚧ Learned

    Gaius maximus
    Joined:
    May 25, 2015
    Parrots:
    883
    Location:
    Halls of Moria
    Have the battles any depth to them or its still the same "build naked corvettes win" crap.
     
    ^ Top  
  25. Jimmiousgender: ⚧ Magister

    Jimmious
    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Parrots:
    2,659
    Not any real depth yet, but the balancing has changed somewhat.
    Fortunately this "upcoming" expansion/DLC seems to be combat oriented so that is subject to change
     
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 1
    ^ Top  

(buying stuff via the above buttons helps us pay the hosting bills, thanks!)