Do i have to close my eyes or play with my elbows to enjoy it too? should slit my wrist so it becomes a race against time?
Placing some constraints is pretty much a must to enjoy most RPG combats, so I don't know why you are acting like it's a new thing. For example, New Vegas combat is downright retarded if you use power armor and hitpoint bloating perks/vanilla leveling, but is quite enjoyable if you mod the bloat out and use light armor. And if you create a fully decked out party in Baldur's Gate 2 or a Harm/Disintegrate mage in Arcanum, enough said. Basically, due to either incompetence or catering to casuals, rpgs games usually have some easy mouth-breathing method to get through combat, which is boring and dull to hardcore players. Nothing wrong with avoiding it.
you are kind of a dumbfuck to be honest. There is plenty of exploration in Witcher 1. Just because its not OPEN WORLD LOLOLOLOL doesnt mean there is nothing to discover. And combat is far far from atrocious, please stop the hyperbole. Combat is very serviceable and pretty entertaining.
Witcher 2 is not a 4/10, and thats a fact, not an opinion. Its probably the strongest game of the three, overall.
You are obviousy a dumb Witcher 3 fanboy. The game has as many faults as the previous entries. But overall all three games are well worth playing.
Seriously bro, you sound dumb as shit.
Working hard to maintain the tag, eh?
Witcher 1 had no real exploration because most zones in it, despite looking expansive were actually fenced in by various visible and invisible walls. You couldn't exactly wander around and explore, you just went from quest giver to quest destination. Vizima was a bit open, but between all the loading zones, loading interiors, houses that couldn't be entered and so on, wasn't exactly exploration enabling either. And the combat in W1 was about the same level of quality as your comments. It was in the fullest sense of the word, a clickfest. Even worse than Diablo type games, because at least in those, every click was meaningful, since it got something done. In W1, the first 30 clicks were just to wind the combo through the low damage initial moves to get to the actual damage causing moves at the end. What a terrible system.
W2 strongest of the 3? Really? Really? It's not even a game, more like a bad movie.
You can't believe that a game you rate 8/10 is slightly leading a game you rate 9/10 by (as of this writing) a whopping 84 votes to 76 votes? Perhaps you are correct about people needing to "lay off the drugs".
The difference between 8 and 9 on a scale of 10 is actually pretty significant. If you transform it to a 100 scale system commonly used in school for grades, an 80 is Good, while a 90 is Great. Big difference.
Also, Witcher 3 is better than a 9, it is an outstanding game, but since it does have flaws and no game probably deserves a 10, I made it a 9. Similarly, Witcher 1 is actually worse than an 8, but since it's a flawed GEM, I was being nice and rounded it up to an 8.