kenup
Scholar
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 134
Maybe. The thing is though, he doesn't bring up an argument about games that have better gameplay due to being in 3D instead of 2D. He specifically implied The Last of Us is better than any 2D 90s game. He said it excels at gameplay, compared to Chrono Trigger, simply because it's 3D(i.e. "better" graphics). Which is what I took a shot at. He didn't compare the games' mechanics/gameplay to show that 3D is beneficial. And above that, he brought up the whole "realism" argument. Which to me, implies he just wants as much graphics as possible and doesn't care about much else.I don't think his argument is graphics. I think he is arguing that adding a third dimension movement-wise makes games better. Sure enough, I think I'd be hard pressed to say that Ninja Gaiden NES isn't less complex than Ninja Gaiden Xbox. Of course that doesn't work as a straight comparison as they are drastically different in ways other than simply 2D and 3D.
Note though that I'm not a proponent of his argument, simply trying to make sense of what he says.
Don't know what to do with his starcraft argument, it seemed strange to me too.
And that doesn't show that he just wants graphics, even if it's just going from 2D to 3D? Though now I see his link has Shadow of The Colossus at the top and his argument is even more strange. He just seems to be part of the "Anything old is bad/You just feel nostalgic" team.Funnily enough he even specifically says OLD pokemons are outdated implying that new pokemon games are okay when as far as I know they just added that 3D perspective change which doesn't change the gameplay at all.