Tacticular Cancer: We'll have your balls

  1. Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
    Dismiss Notice

Codex Interview RPG Codex Interview: Julian Gollop on Phoenix Point

Discussion in 'RPG News & Content' started by Infinitron, May 5, 2017.

  1. Make America Great Again Infinitron Trade Master Patron

    Infinitron
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Parrots:
    60,923
    Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
    Click here and disable ads!
    Tags: Julian Gollop; Phoenix Point; Snapshot Games

    Of all the members of the oldschool game developer pantheon, original X-COM creator Julian Gollop is among the most admirable. With a career spanning over three decades, he's remained humble and unlike many others has never lost his passion for nitty-gritty game design. These days, Julian and his studio are working on Phoenix Point, an X-COM spiritual successor with some interesting twists, and they're currently seeking funding for it on Fig. Prestigious community member sser, who is a connoisseur of all things tactical and a big Gollop fan, decided to send him some questions. It's a more cursory style of interview than our usual, but I'm happy to have an excuse to promote this game. Here's an excerpt:

    So the big question: Time Units or 2-AP or a mix? Lot of folks chomping at the bit to know this one, ha.

    It seems to be a really contentious issue. At the moment we have a nominal 2 action system which is extended by two things. Firstly, if an enemy becomes spotted during movement, then movement is halted, allowing the player to react by either moving or firing. Secondly a range of special actions can extend the number of things a character can do in a turn. These cost 'will points'. Overall its more flexible than modern XCOMs, but still keeps the pace of the game relatively high. My concern with a pure Time Unit system is that it can result in the most optimally effective play being very slow, and ultimately a bit boring. There may be other ways to solve this, and we will experiment some more without a doubt.

    New-XCOM uses ‘abilities’ for its units, and in Ghost Recon: Shadow Wars you implemented something very similar, with the squad being a toolkit and each squaddie a unique ‘tool’ with abilities directed toward very specific solutions. Will Phoenix Point use a system similar to this or return to the hands-off approach of the original X-Com?

    Phoenix Point uses willpower as a key stat. A character's willpower rating determines initial and maximum will points for a battle. Will points are spent on most special actions and abilities. Will points can be lost through injury, morale effects (such as comrades dying or facing a horrifying monster) and special enemy attacks. Forcing will points below zero may cause panic and loss of sanity. Will points can be recovered by resting or through special abilities, such as a leader rallying action.

    What sort of squad compositions can we expect in Phoenix Point? And how can we expect the squads to develop on the strategy screen over time?

    Squad sizes will range from 4 to 16 roughly, but the larger battles will be base defence missions (which don't happen too often). The player will be encouraged to keep squad sizes smaller due to experience point bonuses for smaller squads. The main limitations for squad size will be the availability of healthy soldiers and transport capacity. There won't be other arbitrary restrictions.

    Enemy mutations seem to be a key-point in the game’s design. “Evolution” of objects in games has been a design that surfaces now and again in games, sometimes quite overtly (Spore, Impossible Creatures). With the creature designs, it almost seems like if you lost a squaddie you might see them and their lost equipment repurposed against you in a future monstrosity. What level of ‘evolution’ can we expect out of our enemies, or out of the world in general?

    Alien mutations are based on archetypes which have a particular 'chassis', such as 'humanoid', mixed with body parts based on animal groups, such as 'cephalopod'. Each body part may mutate, providing different functions and capability. It's possible to have a human with relatively minor mutations, such as a tentacled arm, or to have something much more alien looking. The evolution aspect is based on a response to poor performance in battle. If a particular mutant type does badly, it will be mutated in a random fashion. If the new mutation does well, then more of them will be deployed. Each body part type has three levels of improvement, and when a random mutation occurs to a part that has been used previously, the next level of that part is used. Different alien archetypes will arise from different parts of the world, based on the animals that are native to that part of the world.

    You mentioned on Reddit that the ‘pod popping’ XCOM system will not be in Phoenix Point. Excellent! But it begs the question, if the baddies are roaming about independently of the player, can we expect them to be pursuing their own objectives? And will they scare players by opening and slamming doors in the fog of war?

    The enemies will indeed be pursuing objectives, depending on the mission. If they enemy is attacking a haven, or one of your bases, they will actively seek to destroy the vital functional elements of the base or haven. Aliens will also attempt to kill, eat or abduct civilians. If you are attacking then you may be able to infiltrate without alerting the enemy, but once alerted they will search and attack. Sound will be an important factor, especially since the aliens deploy a thick mist in many battles. This will be indicated visually as well.

    Wayward shots leading to disaster or unplanned triumph is one of the charms of procedural combat. So let’s talk bullet physics! A shot in X-Com had the chance to fly by and hit something in the distance. In XCOM, this is (for the most part) not the case, as shots ‘glue’ themselves to their targets and either hit or miss. Chaotic misses were relegated almost entirely to rockets. How is this going to be handled in Phoenix Point?

    We will use a proper trajectory system for rockets, bullets, grenades and so on. Missed shots will definitely hit something, and potentially damage or destroy it. We haven't figured out a way to represent to the player the potential outcome of such attacks yet.​

    Read the full article: RPG Codex Interview: Julian Gollop on Phoenix Point
     
    • Brofist x 25
    • Informative x 6
    • incline x 4
    • Salute x 2
    • Yes! x 2
    • Participation Award x 1
    • [citation needed] x 1
    ^ Top  
  2. an Administrator Arcane

    an Administrator
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Parrots:
    4,078
    Location:
    Grotesqueistan
    :desu:
     
    • Excited! Excited! x 4
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • nice nice x 1
    ^ Top  
  3. Make America Great Again Darth Roxor Prestigious Gentleman Wielder of the Huegpenis, Hater of Eternity

    Darth Roxor
    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Parrots:
    1,865,153
    Location:
    Djibouti
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
    • decline decline x 3
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
    • WTF!? WTF!? x 1
    ^ Top  
  4. Make America Great Again Taka-Haradin puolipeikko Arcane

    Taka-Haradin puolipeikko
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2015
    Parrots:
    2,519
    Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Bubbles In Memoria
    X-com Apocalypse tried to do Mega-City: of course lots of planned content had to be cut.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  5. Make America Great Again Jack Dandy Arcane

    Jack Dandy
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2013
    Parrots:
    2,322
    Location:
    Israel
    Divinity: Original Sin 2
    Great interview, thanks for doing it Julian Gollop and sser !

    Really sounds better and better.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Friendly Friendly x 2
    ^ Top  
  6. undecaf Arcane Patron

    undecaf
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2010
    Parrots:
    2,193
    Location:
    SuomiFinlandPerkele!
    Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2
    Cautiously optimistic. I had hoped they'd steer a bit further from the nuXCOM games than how it seems.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    ^ Top  
  7. ArchAngel Magister

    ArchAngel
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2015
    Parrots:
    6,548
    Very cool article although no new info, at least nothing major. Only new thing I learned is that they are not 100% set on 2 AP system but will still be trying out alternatives.
     
    ^ Top  
  8. sser Arcane

    sser
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Parrots:
    1,864,655
    Location:
    Texas
    Yeah I wanted to probe more, but it sounds like design-wise there are still things being baked. Partly why I put forth a lot of non-PP questions to try and fill it out a bit.
     
    • Brofist x 33
    • nice x 1
    • Informative x 1
    • Love! x 1
    • Yes! x 1
    ^ Top  
  9. orcinator Learned

    orcinator
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2016
    Parrots:
    336
    Location:
    Republic of Kongou
    Disappointing answer.

    That's good to hear but I really want to see it in action until I get excited.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Yes! Yes! x 1
    ^ Top  
  10. Grotesque Arcane

    Grotesque
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2012
    Parrots:
    1,880
    Divinity: Original Sin
    the interviewer catered for storyfags but not one question about bases construction/economy/research/manufacturing etc
    GTFO
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    ^ Top  
  11. Father Foreskin Educated

    Father Foreskin
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2017
    Parrots:
    54
    This interview makes the game sound more intresting than the fig pitch.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    ^ Top  
  12. Ulfhednar Literate

    Ulfhednar
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Parrots:
    19
    Location:
    Valhalla
    Fig game?!... I'll wait, thank you very much.
     
    • Racist Racist x 1
    ^ Top  
  13. oasis789 Arcane

    oasis789
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2012
    Parrots:
    5,287
    Ctrl-F "mod" 0 hits found.

    :despair:
     
    • Funny x 4
    • decline x 2
    • Despair x 2
    • Acknowledge this user's Agenda x 1
    • incline x 1
    ^ Top  
  14. Iri Educated

    Iri
    Joined:
    May 13, 2014
    Parrots:
    32
    Every single thing Gollop says is priceless. He is as cool as he seems.

    Excellent interview, sser!
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
    ^ Top  
  15. Make America Great Again Black Arcane

    Black
    Joined:
    May 8, 2007
    Parrots:
    1,864,727
    1. Destructible environment?
    2. For or against brexit?
     
    ^ Top  
  16. I'm With Her Mustawd for prison Shitty Team Member, ditch at first opportunity Douchebag! Illiterate Sychophantic Noob Village Idiot Weasel Repressed Homosexual Possibly Retarded Trigger Warning Edgy No Fun Allowed Shitposter Cuck Manlet

    Mustawd
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2015
    Parrots:
    8,248
    1. Modified AP system - incline over nuXCOM
    2. Physics of weapon bulets like in X-COM - incline
    3. Destructible terrain - incline
    4. TURN based strategy layer - fucking incline
    5. Emphasis on smaller squads - meh; I liked the aspect of X-com having a mix of rookes, squaddies, sgts, and captains. This is a bit of a let down. At least there IS the option for up to 16 so if modding IS available, maybe some tweaking with the system could make larger squads more viable. Or maybe it's hard mode, in which case, I'm good with that.
    6. Different alien types based on different "parts" being put together - I'm withholding judgement on this, but I hope it doesn't turn out like No Man's Sky's "unique" creatures.
    7. NO mention of modding - declne. I wish modding had been asked about in light of all the creativity of Open X-com and the modding community in XCOM and XCOM2. It's really a missed opportunity if this doesn't come easily moddable.


    Overall I'm happy with the his answers and this is looking like the pieces of a great game. I am very confident Gollop will deliver on this.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 2
    • Acknowledge this user's Agenda Acknowledge this user's Agenda x 1
    ^ Top  
  17. Make America Great Again Alienman Arcane Patron

    Alienman
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Parrots:
    4,548
    Location:
    Mars
    Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2
    Skipping JA2 and Silent Storm and taking inspirations from nuX-com instead :o

    Nice interview, but short answers. Not much new.
     
    ^ Top  
  18. I'm With Her Mustawd for prison Shitty Team Member, ditch at first opportunity Douchebag! Illiterate Sychophantic Noob Village Idiot Weasel Repressed Homosexual Possibly Retarded Trigger Warning Edgy No Fun Allowed Shitposter Cuck Manlet

    Mustawd
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2015
    Parrots:
    8,248
    Based on some of his other interviews when XCOM and XCOM2 came out, I think he was mostly impressed with how they were able to adapt X-com for a modern audience. Not just AP, but also the presentation and the cinematic angles that are kinda necessary to keep the attention span of many new players in a turn based game.
     
    ^ Top  
  19. Make America Great Again Alienman Arcane Patron

    Alienman
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Parrots:
    4,548
    Location:
    Mars
    Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2
    Yeah I know, remember seeing some interviews with him and Solomon. I just found it very surprising that the man behind X-com haven't played JA2 that much.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Despair Despair x 1
    ^ Top  
  20. Make America Great Again ERYFKRAD Arcane Patron

    ERYFKRAD
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Parrots:
    9,214
    Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
    Codex fundraiser when
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Excited! Excited! x 1
    • Yes! Yes! x 1
    ^ Top  
  21. sser Arcane

    sser
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Parrots:
    1,864,655
    Location:
    Texas
    A fair critique. This is the first time I've conducted a Q&A before so I probably missed some things. I also cut out a lot of questions, some because 'answers' kept popping up elsewhere (including answers to your question). After awhile, I just said fuck it and rolled with the questions anyway. I wanted to hear more about the core of Gollop's design strategies, and I kinda beat around the bush here and left the ball in his court, but that's probably better suited to a phone call than it is a Q&A anyway.
     
    • Thanks! Thanks! x 2
    • Salute Salute x 2
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    • Doggy Doggy x 1
    ^ Top  
  22. Space Satan Arcane

    Space Satan
    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Parrots:
    2,672
    Location:
    Space Hell
    So far the only disappointment for me are biomass and only three factions. But I've seen worse.
     
    ^ Top  
  23. Israfael Arcane

    Israfael
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Parrots:
    1,899
    Good interview, but some critical points were not asked, like:
    1) Why simulation is better than game - he covered this in his XCOM postmortem interviews, but it'd be still nice if he confirms that (or explains why he's changed his opinion)
    2) how he will implement freeform combat in a 2-phase system (aka will the Willpoints be actually TUs apart from their name or he'll have to do crutches like classes / perks in Solomon's abomination)
    3) how will cover work (this is the most worrying part at this moment, check Fig's FAQ - he says it'll be like XCOM 2 and we definitely don't want % based cover system as it ruins all tactics)
     
    ^ Top  
  24. Goral Arcane Patron The Real Fanboy

    Goral
    Joined:
    May 4, 2008
    Parrots:
    1,569
    Location:
    Poland
    Thanks sser.

    Infinitron
    You're taking credit for others work again, when clicking on the interview only you are mentioned when it should be sser.

    http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/inde...-editorials-are-not-credited-properly.113510/

    Another lie.

    Edit:
    Proof that you need to keep (((Infinitron))) on a short leash lest he will try and use you:

    He changed it only after I've told him to do it, has no decency himself and rates my post butthurt :D.
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2017
    • butthurt butthurt x 4
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • retadred retadred x 1
    ^ Top  
  25. Wonderdog Neckbeard Shitlord's alt

    Wonderdog
    Joined:
    May 2, 2017
    Parrots:
    648
    Make a review submission area, have the person post into that area, then move the review into the news area once the review is final. Another 'impossible' problem solved thanks to my 150s IQ.

    2 action system is shit, I really hope they don't do that. Why on earth can all these spiritual successors just not make the same exact game, except with graphics that aren't massively outdated?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Salute Salute x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
    ^ Top  

(buying stuff via the above buttons helps us pay the hosting bills, thanks!)