Nice poll, good job on the organizers, interesting methodology that apparently took some research
but
while the list looks interesting and full of variety at first, looking at the actual votes gives me the impression of an unsorted dump of titles.
You have LISA at position 16, yet it only has 17 votes total, and only 13 are actually positive. That is clearly an outlier. As are all the titles with minimal votes (let's say 10-20).
It's not much better with the games that got 100-200 votes, e.g. Legend of Heroes at position 7 with 139 votes, when the most anticipated games have many times more votes.
I guess Bayesian average tries to compensate for a low amount of votes, by extrapolating what the votes would have been if there were more of them, but that is just speculation. It seems to me that not playing and not rating a title, cannot be taken into account in any meaningful way.Worse, I would hazard that not playing a title, is a sign of lack of interest, therefore if it was actually played, it could very well get bad to medium ratings.
Anyway, just to see what the most played games were, I sorted them be number of votes (ignoring less than about 200 votes):
D:OS 906
W2 813
Dragonfall 606
BannerSaga 510
Blackguards 492
DA:I 458
SouthPark 441
MMX 433
DarkSouls2 414
GrimrockII 347
DiabloIII:Ros 313
DeadState 274
Xulima 271
Xenonauts 270
NEO 198
Risen3 194
which I find much more indicative of the trend in the forums (but since I'm a lurker, I could be mistaken).
Generally, I disagree with positive and negative voting in the same poll (maybe separate polls to vote for best / worst titles), and anonymous voting. I also find the staff poll simple and more to the point. But that's just me.