Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Decline Paradox Interactive is going public

Space Satan

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
6,216
Location
Space Hell
Watch the announcement: March 15th, 5PM Pacific
xc4ujr7.png
 

Maculo

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
2,533
Strap Yourselves In Pathfinder: Wrath
I wish Paradox luck, because I remember Federal Securities regulations for public companies being a bitch to wrestle with.
 

LESS T_T

Arcane
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
13,582
Codex 2014
An interview regarding the IPO: http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...wester-always-experiment-always-do-new-things

"Bungie has a deal with Activision for 20 years...We would be interested in doing something like that"

Paradox is on the eve of an IPO, but Fredrik Wester isn't looking to settle down

Last time I sat down with Fredrik Wester, at 2014's E3, he told me that 2015 was going to be Paradox's year, and he was right. In terms of sales and critical success, Cities: Skylines and Pillars of Eternity set new targets for the company, established new partnerships and reached new audiences without betraying the niche focus which has been the furnace at the heart of the company's engine.

So what better time to go public than riding the high of your most successful year yet? I'm told by Paradox's CFO that Swedish law prevents them from talking about plans in much specific detail, but Wester has, in fairly typical style, already confirmed that it's something he wants to happen in 2016, reassuring fans about the company's future with a couple of choice Churchillisms. Sitting down with Wester in the Samovar tea rooms towards the end of a busy GDC, it seems like a decent place to start the conversation.

"Our main plan right now is to float the company on the stock exchange, but all the details aren't set," he says, supping some sort of exotic Rooibos. "We're ready for it as a company, and we've taken all the measures and all the reporting details and everything, but all in all, the most important thing for me right now is that I'll still be the biggest shareholder and still be running the company, and so I'll have the same majority share as I had before. So it is really more a way to let people in on the journey that is Paradox Interactive."

That sounds a little like a marketing soundbite, which rings a little oddly from someone as frank as Wester, so I press a bit on the potential risks. Surely as a niche publisher, even one doing so well, there's a danger that shareholders might want to pull the company's portfolio in more predictable directions, to ask "why are you making Crusader Kings instead of Call of Duty?" Wester is confident that these aren't the sort of shareholders they'll be bringing into the fold, also confiding that the IPO will "not primarily be targeting institutions."

"We've said this to everyone who comes on board at Paradox," he continues. "'If you believe we're on the right track...,' When my business partner was bought out six years ago, we brought in an investment company, the ones who are now the second biggest owner after myself. One of the key things that was important to us was that they would not interfere in operational tasks, like what kind of games we do, what kind of people we hire, what the culture is at Paradox. So if they trust us as a company, as a management team, to build different gaming teams and to deliver something great, they should invest and buy my business partner out. Otherwise they should just stay away. And that is something I've repeated a lot of times too. We brought in a new owner two years ago in May who bought some shares, and we had the same walkthrough with him, saying, 'If you think we can do a good job going forward, then...'

"I'm never making estimations for coming years because if you look historically at what Paradox has produced in the past and you see the growth we've had organically in 30 years, and you think that we can still continue to produce great results, well, great, that's what we think ourselves. But I will never go out and say, 'We're gonna grow by 20 per cent this year,' or, 'We're gonna do this, we're gonna do that.' I'm cautiously optimistic by nature, but I'm also aware that there are a lot of ups and downs in the gaming industry. That is basically the philosophy behind the company, and it's rooted deep, not only on the business side but in the games side as well. We run things by letting smart people do what they're best at doing and not having me interfere in what they're doing, because if I meddled in game design and a lot of other things, it would go badly. The more I moved away from the operational game decisions, the better games we started producing. And that's a valuable lesson for me to learn."

Retaining a majority stake pretty much settles the argument of whether Wester retains the final say, but surely there must be a part of him that sometimes considers a slight shift to the mainstream. Given the triumphs of Cities, a game which is still niche, but probably less so than, say, Hearts of Iron, has the last year softened his resolve? Has there been any unrest amongst the company's vocal and engaged fanbase?

"I think what you're saying people are fearing, that we're going more mainstream and that we're not sticking to our guns, I don't think there's a need to fear that, because we're still experimenting a lot. My speech tomorrow is about business models and value propositions and value design for games - how business model design and game design goes hand-in-hand, and the worst thing that can ever happen for a company is that you get locked into your own business model and you stop innovating on that, because after a while you'll get trapped in a business model where your customers never allow you to change it because there will be an outrage among the core fans and they will abandon the game, orthere will be a slight decline because you're not inventing new things in the game and it will still die because of that.

"So keeping the pace all the time is what game design and business design is about. That is also the philosophy that we have: always experiment, always do new things. It will take Paradox into territory where fans do not feel comfortable or maybe we do not feel comfortable, but we do it to push ourselves to make better products, and if we hadn't made Magicka in 2011, with the success that Magicka had back then, we probably wouldn't have pushed ourselves to make such a great launch of Crusader Kings II, which in turn led to a great Europa Universalis IV, which pushed the boundaries even further. So I think each great release will benefit the next release, even if it's a niche game or if it's a game that goes out to the masses. But our success formula is the niche, and I still consider Cities: Skylines fairly niche."

On the subject of steering your own destiny, I'm interested to know if Wester plans to follow up the success of 2015 with expansion, perhaps moving outside of Sweden to establish a foreign office, or taking two steps at a time by acquiring a studio. He's got a few options mapped out.

"We have had discussions on where to find talent and how to grow the company, definitely," he says. "It's an ongoing discussion, but so far we spread our risks by signing talented teams that make great games for us, like Colossal Order, like Obsidian and other guys. While we can't hire people ourselves, we can work with established teams that can make really great products, but our next step is logically to look at if we can maybe buy studios or if we can expand in other ways like longer term partnerships. I think Bungie has a deal with Activision for 20 years or something like that. We would be interested in doing something like that with a partner, which maybe would work with a range of IPs or something else. Maybe we say that, 'We're only gonna work on this IP now for eight years, and you're gonna take it further in this direction.' That would be interesting to look at. I don't have any cases like that right now, but definitely it would be something we would consider."

The scope of Wester's comparisons give you a sense of his ambition. Citing one of the biggest pub/dev deals of recent years as a potential blueprint for expansion certainly shows that Paradox isn't wanting for desire, but does he really think it's ready for something like that?

"I think that the biggest challenge in our industry is communication," he says, intensely. "As long as you handle the communication well and you speak to each other and you bring up the problems that the project has...a game project is a bit like Columbus when he set out in 1492 to go to Asia and all of a sudden he ends up at a totally different continent, and no one knows what to do. Everything is just chaotic. And that is the nature of both the game design business and on the business process itself, the business design, if you will. So, every new project is a new Magellan or Columbus or whatever, and shit is gonna happen during those journeys." A smile. "It's interesting times."

A 20-year deal with Obsidian?

:troll:
 

ZagorTeNej

Arcane
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
1,980
So much PR speak, it's nauseating. Wake up me up when they hire Obsidian to make a WoD game. Heck, Bloodlines spiritual successor has such slam-dunking potential it's probably giving Feargus a boner, Deus Ex HR and Dishonored prove those type of games sell enough to satisfy even big companies/studios and Obsidian has experience with similar games in F:NV and Alpha Protocol.

You could even bring Mitsoda back, I'm sure he'd jump at the chance.
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
33,052
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Eh, guess I might actually buy some of their shares, because why the fuck not.

Actually, better idea: let's do a Codex fundraiser to buy ALL the shares so we can then force Codexian values on Paradox.
 

LESS T_T

Arcane
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
13,582
Codex 2014
So, today is the day.



Paradox Interactive AB (publ) (“Paradox” or “The Company”), a leading global developer and publisher of strategy games, simulation games and RPGs primarily for the PC platform in North America and Europe, today commences trading on Nasdag First North Premier under the trading symbol PDX.
  • The price in the Offering was set at SEK 33 per share, corresponding a valuation of the Company of SEK 3 485 million.
  • The Offering comprised a total of 16,327,400 existing shares, all of which were offered by the Selling Shareholders in Paradox, corresponding to approximately 15 percent of the total shares in the Company and an Offering size of SEK 539 million. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the Selling Shareholders.
  • Through the Offering, the Company received more than 20,000 new shareholders. As a long-term Partner Investor, Swedbank Robur has acquired shares in the Offering corresponding to a value of SEK 60 million and an ownership of 1.7 %. As a fan to the Company and its games, Tencent, the world-leading online game developer/operator and recognized as the largest online gaming community in China has, as announced on May 27 2016, acquired shares in the Offering corresponding to a value of SEK 174 million and an ownership of 5 %.
  • Fredrik Wester and Spiltan will continue to be long-term shareholders in Paradox with 33.3 % and 30.5 % of the shares in the Company respectively.
  • Trading in the Company’s shares on Nasdaq First North Premier commences today, 31 May 2016, under the trading symbol PDX.
Fredrik Wester, CEO, founder and principal owner of Paradox says:
“I am very pleased with the very large interest shown for Paradox during the listing process – from fans, employees and other parties with a long-term interest in our company. The listing will provide us with improved opportunities to continue on our profitable path and implement our strategy to immerse ourselves in our gaming niches, broaden our technology platform and expand beyond our core markets in order to create a better presence closer to our fans.”

Håkan Sjunnesson, Chairman of Paradox and head of Investment AB Spiltan’s holding in Paradox says:
“The large interest shown for our company is a stamp of approval for our way of conducting our business and the hard work put in by all of our employees to develop and bring to market exciting games to our fans around the world. I welcome all new shareholders in our company and look forward to bringing them to join our coming journey.”

Advisors
Avanza Bank is acting as Lead Advisor and Bookrunner and Pepins as Placement Agent through its crowdfunding platform. Fogel & Partners is acting as strategic communications advisor to the Company and Setterwalls is acting as legal advisor to the Company and its selling shareholders.
 

Perkel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
15,810
Next gameloft lol
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom