Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Let's Catch Jack the Ripper - 3

laclongquan

Arcane
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,870,144
Location
Searching for my kidnapped sister
Archaeon said:
You are all making a big mistake here. At first I also thought about choosing the choices you guys did, but after a careful scrutiny of both all the choices and all the characters I realised that these choices i first made are meant to get as many fine details about the crime as possible in a style not dissimilar to Sherlock Holmes, and that character skillset is not what we chose, though the guy was in the list.
My reasoning is that the choices I've made are the choices that he, Tom Wise would make. He felt a strong attachment to the girl, as indicated in the emotion descriptions littered throughout the dialogue, so he would likely want to see her himself, plus gaining useful info about the way she was murdered. And second, the bars are the most likely place -Tom Wise- would go for additional info.



I may be wrong, but you are METAGAMING :M

I agree with your reasonings but I arrived at a different conclusion. We dont know enough if the gal mean that much to him. And he cared about the whole things, not just the girl, so the logical thing to do is he going to find out more about the situation from his point of views: are there more girls killed and mutilated like that?

From that point of view , a visit to her fellow prostitutes seem just the thing to do. CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

After that, it's Turnbull we visit. The man is dangerous, so a visit during high sustainance seem safer, since we have time to rest and recupate after an injury. And his subordinate, Pizer, is said to be overenthusiatic in dealing with girls, so that's an avenue to investigate, too. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Thing is, Tom Wise will look for the criminal from the underbelly of the City, like a bloodhound tracing the scents, so a Sherlock Holmes approach doesnt fit him.
 

Gondolin

Arcane
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
5,827
Location
Purveyor of fine art
ironyuri said:
Gond, check the choice again. We don't get to ask any questions, just hear what the police and doctor have to say, which is that a woman was killed. They won't have any info, so A won't help a char like ours.

They should have some info: who, where, when, who found her, what the scene looked like. If you want to go to the newspapers, you should at least know all this beforehand. I would've voted K, but I'm guessing that newspapers are pretty much flooded with so-called witnesses looking to sell their stories.
 

Esquilax

Arcane
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
4,833
Seriously guys, don't pick A. Biggest bullshit waste of time we could have here. Worst choice we could make.

ADVANTAGE: Tom spends much of his night-time in lodging-houses and on the streets; he will be, therefore, closer to the murders and the victims themselves and more likely to actually witness a murder than any other character. He is also a formidably trained soldier – and more than a match for the killer should it come to a fight.

DISADVANTAGE: Tom must survive, and none of the jobs he can perform make a great deal of money; he will, therefore, have to repeatedly devote his time to gaining money.

OK, our boy Tommy is undeniably a BRO character who can beat the shit out of Jack if it comes down to it. Our power is physical and social, not political and scholarly, so we should play to our strengths. We're not going to examine the body; we're a soldier, not the High Priest character.

First, we've got to put ourselves in a position to possibly be there for a murder or know what the fuck is going on. Second, we have even more severe time restrictions than the other character classes - our job doesn't earn us a great deal of money, so we need to find a better way of making some dough here.

Pretending to be a witness is useful here because it gives us a way to survive and make more money than we would by performing. As an added bonus, let's say that there's an element of truth to our bullshit - it might lead the cops in the right direction. What the fuck is Jack going to do, try and take us out? We've got muscles, time to flex them.

However, looking to Dick Turnbull for work is even better. We're an ex-military badass; fuck performing, we should be doing gangster shit out there to make some fucking bread. Dick's got info on Jack from both his inside man in the police and his contacts on the street, as well as a vested interest in seeing Jack go down, seeing as a vicious serial killer would bring too much heat on everybody. I say we talk to Polly's friends to see what went down (I'm sure those ladies will open up to a charming guy like Tommy), then go see Turnbull about work.

CI
 

laclongquan

Arcane
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,870,144
Location
Searching for my kidnapped sister
If any of you consider playing fake witness, do remmeber that it's one-shot free sustainance action. You do it once only, I think. We can always save that easy option for when we are unable to work for sustainance (too hurt to work, e.g.).
 

Archaeon

Scholar
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
353
Location
Gypoland
laclongquan said:
If any of you consider playing fake witness, do remmeber that it's one-shot free sustainance action. You do it once only, I think. We can always save that easy option for when we are unable to work for sustainance (too hurt to work, e.g.).
Agree.

And I'm more than recomending disscusing each others' choices.
 

ironyuri

Guest
@Esquilax:

Doesn't say Turnbull will give us work, I think it's still one of the 'info' options, unless grotsnik clarifies.

Even if alot of witnesses come forward, few will have the story telling/persuasion/speech skill that our character has. He's basically a diplo-sniper from Fallout, or diplo-melee. We should use it to the best of our abilities.
 

Gondolin

Arcane
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
5,827
Location
Purveyor of fine art
ironyuri said:
Even if alot of witnesses come forward, few will have the story telling/persuasion/speech skill that our character has. He's basically a diplo-sniper from Fallout, or diplo-melee. We should use it to the best of our abilities.

Sure, but you have no control over what he's going to tell the newspaper either. If our wild story is added to the gossip and rumors, we're just going to hear it repeated in the streets. Plus, there's no telling how it would impact the official investigation.

Basically, our character should roam the streets at night and wait to run into a murder, but this is not the kind of playing that suits me. :smug:
 

Tigranes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
10,350
CI.

We clearly need to take advantage of our character and pick one informal info-gathering option; C seems to be the likeliest to get the kind of info we won't easily get elsewhere.

I don't think Sustenance is a high priority yet, right now we don't know much so it's more important to get maximum info - then we can make more informed decisions about where to go, leaving time for sustenance.

We should also get character-related info on alive, important people asap for future leverage.
 

Johnny the Mule

Educated
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
567
B) Visit Dr Llewellyn; it would be best to get a fuller view of what happened to the corpse.

E) Visit Petticoat Lane, to examine the knives on view there.


CCCombo Choice!
Ask the Doc bout the knives and go looking for nice sweet cold things.
 

ironyuri

Guest
Johnny the Mule said:
B) Visit Dr Llewellyn; it would be best to get a fuller view of what happened to the corpse.

E) Visit Petticoat Lane, to examine the knives on view there.


CCCombo Choice!
Ask the Doc bout the knives and go looking for nice sweet cold things.

deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerp

at least draw some nice pictures orgasm. fuck.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
6,207
Location
The island of misfit mascots
A and I

A killing has just occurred - now is NOT the time to waste with sustenance, it's important to use the opportunity of the moment just after the kill to get info that may degrade or disappear later. It's the start of the event, so the most vital options are those that involve getting large amounts of broad information that can be followed up later. Going to the inquest will give us a hefty list of the witnesses, authorities and interested parties, and also get us some info with regard to the corpse. There's no point in Tom looking at the corpse himself - he doesn't have the expertise for that - it's better that he goes to the inquest and finds out what the experts have to say regarding the autopsy and who all the relevant parties are going to be.

So A is the most important choice by a long measure.

I. as second choice is again good this early in the event, and will be of diminishing value later. The reason why we should see Turnbull is to get 'the other side' of the events - i.e. we can find out the witnesses, authorities and what the police know from the inquest, we can find out what the criminals and underworld know from Turnbull. Means that we get an opening turn that sets us up with a full account of who we need to talk to, and what we need to do from there. Between the two, it should give us a complete picture of the 'state of play' for the event.

Also, even though we can't speak up at the inquest, by talking to Turnbull we can try to impress upon him the fact that this isn't a common killing (was obvious that there was no money to be gained, the method indicates a real hatred of prostitutes that is likely to motivate more strikes on Turnbull's women, hurting Turnbull financially). If we can convince Turnbull that it is in his interests to look into who the killer is, we may be able to offer our services, possibly helping with sustenance at the same time as we look for Jack, avoiding the need to take time out for sustenance (i.e. offer ourselves as a dedicated investigator, in return for lodging/food during the time). May also be able to convince Turnbull to implement measures to discover further clues or maximise info the next time Jack strikes - e.g. by convincing him to have someone keep lookout around the streets that the girls are 'attracting custom', or to get him to give you whatever info he can get from his pet policeman.

So: A and I make the most sense.
 

Esquilax

Arcane
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
4,833
Azrael the cat said:
A and I

A killing has just occurred - now is NOT the time to waste with sustenance, it's important to use the opportunity of the moment just after the kill to get info that may degrade or disappear later. It's the start of the event, so the most vital options are those that involve getting large amounts of broad information that can be followed up later. Going to the inquest will give us a hefty list of the witnesses, authorities and interested parties, and also get us some info with regard to the corpse. There's no point in Tom looking at the corpse himself - he doesn't have the expertise for that - it's better that he goes to the inquest and finds out what the experts have to say regarding the autopsy and who all the relevant parties are going to be.

So A is the most important choice by a long measure.

Problem is, we aren't a dude with clout. We aren't a journalist, a cop, politician, etc. - we don't fucking matter. More importantly, it's not in Tom's nature to attend a big inquest like this; does he really seem like the kind of dude who will stand around seeing what the "experts" have to say? Tommy doesn't strike me as a dude who will just sit around and listen to a bunch of dudes talk about a whole bunch of shit that he doesn't care about. He's a man of action, and we should play him as such.

C or H would be far more successful for our particular type of character. Tom is a charming, bar-hopping type who mingles with common people; we'll have the most success there. Sure, we'll get some bullshit strewn in there amongst the good info, but we'll sure as shit do better than going to see the official investigation where nobody will really give a fuck about what we want and we have no in-character motivation to go to begin with.

Azrael the cat said:
I. as second choice is again good this early in the event, and will be of diminishing value later. The reason why we should see Turnbull is to get 'the other side' of the events - i.e. we can find out the witnesses, authorities and what the police know from the inquest, we can find out what the criminals and underworld know from Turnbull. Means that we get an opening turn that sets us up with a full account of who we need to talk to, and what we need to do from there. Between the two, it should give us a complete picture of the 'state of play' for the event.

Also, even though we can't speak up at the inquest, by talking to Turnbull we can try to impress upon him the fact that this isn't a common killing (was obvious that there was no money to be gained, the method indicates a real hatred of prostitutes that is likely to motivate more strikes on Turnbull's women, hurting Turnbull financially). If we can convince Turnbull that it is in his interests to look into who the killer is, we may be able to offer our services, possibly helping with sustenance at the same time as we look for Jack, avoiding the need to take time out for sustenance (i.e. offer ourselves as a dedicated investigator, in return for lodging/food during the time). May also be able to convince Turnbull to implement measures to discover further clues or maximise info the next time Jack strikes - e.g. by convincing him to have someone keep lookout around the streets that the girls are 'attracting custom', or to get him to give you whatever info he can get from his pet policeman.

So: A and I make the most sense.

Absolutely, it's in Turnbull's best interests to find Jack before he brings in a ton of heat on him. Our boy Tom is a badass, super-confident dude with some persuasive ability. However, this shit comes with a price; Turnbull almost certainly knows where Tommy's skills lie, so he will almost certainly try to get us to do some dirty work in exchange for money. However, I say it's worth it; street-performing doesn't earn dick and it is a huge drain on our time, so I think thugging it up is the smart play here.
 

oscar

Arcane
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
8,036
Location
NZ
I doubt rumour-gathering will be of much use here, as the murder has only just occurred.

I seems a good choice. Setting up a relationship with Turnbull will be nice, principally so we can specialise our efforts a bit and hopefully form a bit of team. At the very least we might be able to score a better source of Sustenance

As for my second vote I'm torn between F and L. Jack Pizer seems like another "good guy to know" and perhaps a backup if Turnbull fails. The extra Sustenance would also be handy and could save us later.

G stirred my interest but I'm not confident that even if we saw her body we'd be able to learn much.
 

grotsnik

Arcane
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
1,671
Hey, either you can have a historically accurate retelling of the inquest, with information, clues and witnesses taken from a variety of contemporary records, or I can rush through it and give you some Bioware shit with three lines of dialogue and an obvious villain glowering in the corner before the hero stands up and does a renegade interrupt, punching out reporters...actually, that sounds quite fun. No wonder Baldur's Gate is beloved by developers everywhere. Maybe I'll just do that instead.
 

ironyuri

Guest
grotsnik said:
Hey, either you can have a historically accurate retelling of the inquest, with information, clues and witnesses taken from a variety of contemporary records, or I can rush through it and give you some Bioware shit with three lines of dialogue and an obvious villain glowering in the corner before the hero stands up and does a renegade interrupt, punching out reporters...actually, that sounds quite fun. No wonder Baldur's Gate is beloved by developers everywhere. Maybe I'll just do that instead.

Fuck the reporters.

I want to punch the judge.


Also, the judge should be called "Magistrate Udina" and he should be a dick.

Commander Shepard vs. The Rippers ahoy.

I hope the plot twist is that this Ripper is killing women to open a portal to a dimension where many more Rippers await.
 

ironyuri

Guest
The hall is filled with people jostling to get a better view of the proceedings as the presiding magistrate enters and takes his seat. He begins, "Ladies and gentleman, we are here today to hold an inquest into the death of a local prossie."

...

Sergeant Alenko: "They says 'e was a big bastard... all dressed in black. Down Whitechapel, they're callin' 'im the Ripper!"
Magistrate Udina: "Ah yes.... "The Ripper". Look, these silly rumours and fabrications are bound to come out of cases like this, Sergeant. I don't think the public need to hear anymore about your benighted "Rippers"."
Shepard interrupt!: "But they're real! I've seen the Ripper myself! YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU DON'T KNOW! HE'S OUT THERE KILLING RIGHT NOW! MAKING THE WORLD READY FOR THEIR RETURN! THE RIPPERS ARE COMING!"
 

grotsnik

Arcane
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
1,671
1-3 September

Sustenance - 1

"The affair up to the present is enveloped in complete mystery, and the police have as yet no evidence to trace the perpetrators of the horrible deed."
The East London Advertiser


institute.jpg


______________________________________________________________________________


The Working Lad’s Institute on Whitechapel Road, a low-ceilinged hall tucked between market-stalls and pubs, is usually empty other than for a few socialist cranks and religious sermons held by the Methodist landlords. This morning, a queue of chattering bodies stretches out from under the little wooden arch, upon which ‘Lecture Hall’ has been crudely whitewashed, and out into the street.

Some of the eager spectators appear to be working girls; a few more appear to be higher-class youths, dressed up to the nines in hats and waistcoats, chortling amongst themselves. Wise takes his place behind them and waits, patient and unnoticed, as the hall begins to fill.

Benches have been laid out across the room, in front of a makeshift table where the coroner, a dandyish, slender fellow with a finely-trimmed moustache, is shuffling papers, and a row of chairs for the jury; a constable hovers nearby, shooing back the piling forward to try and nab them.

Wise finds a free space of wall in the furthest corner and, pressing gently forward through the crush, is able to lean comfortably against it.

It’s another twenty minutes before the coroner finally decides to begin; in the meantime, the assembled crowd chatters and squabbles. Some of the men produce newspapers and awkwardly, pushing out their elbows, begin to read; an old biddy in an apron is passing around boiled sweets. Wise remains still, and small against his scrap of wall, internalising himself, letting his thoughts sink away into nothing. He’s spent too many long, sweaty nights like this in Africa, resting against a cool brick wall or the thick trunk of a baobab tree, lost in a kind of watchful rest, time slipping forward to the moment when you were needed-

“Very well,” one of the constables shouts, and has to shout it twice more before the hubbub of noise subsides. “Very well, ladies and gentlemen, very well. Please…silence, please, for the Coroner, Mr Wynne Baxter. If you please, ladies and gentlemen, if you please-“

Baxter smiles, thinly.

“We have a lot to get through,” he says, in a sharp voice that carries across the hall and brings, at last, silence. “We have Inspector Helson with us, I believe, with some of his officers, attending on behalf of the Criminal Investigation Department. We should also have Mr Edward Walker, who’s just now come from the mortuary. Is Mr Edward Walker here?”

A grey-haired, stoutly-built man, with weary eyes, raises his hand from near the middle of the packed room. The gesture itself seems to defeat him, and he drops it again, quickly. Heads are craning to stare at him from every direction.

“Come forward, please, Mr Walker,” Baxter calls. “Address and occupation?”

Walker’s thick, crude fists are clenched as he pushes forward through the crowd. He pauses, for a moment, and then says, in a near-whisper, his gaze locked firmly on the coroner,

“I live at 15 Maidwell Street, in Camberwell…and I have no occupation. Was a smith when I was at work, but I’m…not now. I’ve seen the body in the mortuary,” he continues, plunging on without being prompted, “and to the best of the knowledge it’s my daughter, but…I’ve not seen her in three years. I recognise her by her, her general appearance, and by a little mark she’s had on her forehead since a child. She’d also had two or three teeth out…same as the woman I’ve seen. She was forty-two years of age.”

The lecture hall is now entirely hushed, other than for the horrid scratching of a dozen reporters’ pens against paper; outside, a tradesman can faintly be heard, yelling obscenities.

“You said you last saw her three years ago?” Baxter asks, steepling his fingers.

The old man blushes.

“No, sir,” he says, “it would’ve been two years ago last June.”

“Was she in a good situation?”

“I don’t know,” Walker says, more sharply. “I was not on speaking in terms with her. She had been living with me, sir, some three or four years previous, but she thought she could do better…so, I let her go.”

“Was she a sober woman?” presses Baxter.

“Well, at times she drank,” Walker responds. He’s a touch defensive now; he keeps glancing around at the crowd, as if expecting them to laugh at him. “That was why we fell out, see – but look, I never turned her out. She had no need to be like this while I had a home for her.”

Baxter nods, and then asks,

“And was she fast?”

And this time someone does laugh; a high-pitched cackle, from one of the working girls loitering at the very back of the room. Her friends shush her, but Walker sees it, and scowls.

“No,” he snaps, and then relents. “She used to go with some young women and men that she knew…but I never heard of anything improper.”

“How is it,” Baxter says, “that she was not living with her husband?”

Walker is looking decidedly unhappy now; he fidgets, from one foot to the other.

“When she was confined,” he answers, after a moment, “her husband took on, er, with another woman, and they parted, he with four of their children – the fifth lives with me, sir. Afterwards she was stopping with another man…Drew, a smith by trade, but there’s been another man since. I don’t know who he is.”

Another burst of laughter from the back of the crowd, followed by an outbreak of shushes.

“You’ve been very patient, Mr Walker,” says Baxter, “and we thank you for that. One final question – is there anything you know of that could help us shed light upon this affair?”

“Oh, no,” Walker responds, at once. “I don’t think she had any enemies. She was too good for that.”


_______________________________________________________________________________


The next witness, Alfred Malshaw, is a night-watchman from Winthrope Street, just a short distance from where the body was found. He grins and winks as he presents his statement, clearly enjoying the attention.

“I doze, sometimes,” he admits, “but a cry would’ve woken me, and I didn’t hear no cries.”

A murmur of appreciative laughter from the crowd.

“We may take it, then,” Baxter says, coldly, “that your watching is not up to much, Mr Malshaw?”

The watchman scoffs.

“It’s a long thirteen hours,” he responds, “for three shillings and no coal. But I didn’t hear nothing, and I didn’t see nothing neither, and that's the honest truth. If she'd screamed, I'd have come running."


________________________________________________________________________________



Dr Llewellyn is short and bearded, with a lilting Welsh accent. He sways, a little, pale-faced, as he speaks, in the stuffy confines of the hall.

“There was very little blood around her throat,” he says, “and no marks of any struggle or disturbances – which would occur if the body had been dragged. Along the right side of the face there was a bruise, running along the side of the jaw, and a corresponding circular bruise on the left side of the face, which I suppose to have been caused by the fingers – as if the assailant took hold of her face. Beneath her jawline were two incisions – one about four inches long and rising to the neck, and another circular incision…about eight inches long, severing the tissue all the way down to the vertebrae and the large vessels of the neck. Once the body was in the mortuary…I was called upon again, as it appeared there had been discovered another series of wounds across the lower abdomen, which would have occurred after the fatal cut to the throat. Jagged cuts, struck downwards, slicing through the tissue – three or four on either side. One very deep wound in particular. These cuts would have been caused by a long-bladed knife, at least moderately short…with extreme violence. The wounds were all from left to right, and might, I speculate, have been done by a left-handed person.”

He takes a step backwards, as if to steady himself.

“You are exhausted, Doctor Llewellyn,” Baxter says, gently.

The doctor simply nods and says,

“I have not slept, sir.”

“You said,” the coroner adds, “that despite the…grievous nature of these wounds, there was little blood. Could you speculate as to why that might be?”

“I would…guess,” Llewellyn says, choosing his words carefully, “that the victim would have been laid down upon her back before these wounds were administered. That blood which did escape from the body simply…soaked into her clothes.”

“But as you say, there were no signs of a struggle, no bruises other than those across her face, the estimable Mr Malshaw did not hear a cry, and we can hardly imagine that she would have laid down quietly in the street at her murderer’s request…”

The doctor makes an expressive gesture.

“A mystery, then,” Baxter says, and glances back down at his papers. “Thank you, doctor.”

“I can think of one reason she’d have been lying on her back,” someone whispers, close to Wise’s ear, and begins to snigger.


___________________________________________________________________________________


Over the next few days, more men come to give their evidence, as feeble as it is; the police constable who found the body, and who testifies that the woman had on her a comb, a scrap of mirror-glass, and a new silk bonnet, but no money of any kind, slaughter-house workers who were toiling away nearby but who didn’t hear or see a thing, men and women sleeping in the nearby houses who didn’t hear a thing. A signalman from the railway insists that he saw a man with a knife and a wooden arm stalking the streets some weeks before the murder, but this is quickly proven to have been an invention based around the character of John James, a cheerful and harmless lunatic with one arm who begs on the streets for pennies. Polly’s husband is found, William Nicholls, a frightened-looking printer’s machinist who insists that he did not leave his wife for another woman, but that she left him, “with no occasion for doing so.” He admits to knowing that she’d found lovers afterwards, but cannot recall their names. A lodging-house keeper, Emily Holland, explains bashfully, to a chorus of hisses, that she turned the deceased woman out onto the street that night at around half past two.

“She didn’t have no money for the doss,” she insists, “and she told me she’d had it and drunk it three times that day. Said she’d head right out and be back with it, so I weren’t to let anyone take her bed. I waited up, but she never came back.

“Did you know how the deceased made her living?” the coroner asks.

“No,” Mrs Holland says, and once again the lecture hall erupts with mischievous laughter.

Finally, Baxter, looking bored, throws up his hands.

“We can do no more,” he says. “I will sum up. This…unfortunate woman, who was, according to the testimony of Mrs Holland, much the worse for drink, was apprehended and killed in Buck’s Row – her body being found some time later at a quarter to four. At first thought…it seems astonishing that the murderer should not have been seen on the deserted streets, particularly with blood upon his hands. However, we must remember that there are many in this area of London who work in slaughterhouses, and a man with a good knowledge of the alleys and routes may make his way unnoticed in the dark. We must, therefore, if we are to have a hope of catching the perpetrator, consider his possible motive. Robbery is out of the question, since she was destitute, and there is nothing to suggest jealousy or a quarrel. No incriminating evidence has been found, and the victim was murdered without having a chance, it seems, to cry out – indeed, the audacity and daring of the deed is equal to its maniacal fanaticism and abhorrent wickedness. And this murder may, indeed, be connected to those attacks which have occurred in the district over the last year. Only one thing, it seems, is clear – that a murder of a most atrocious character has been committed.”

The jury only confers for a few minutes, the noise rising once again through the hall, before the foreman, a burly, bald man in his fifties and a tatty suit, rises to return a verdict of wilful murder by person or persons unknown.

“With regards,” he adds, “to this, the latest of the crimes that’s been committed in our midst here in Whitechapel, I think that if a reward were to be offered for information about this monster who’s attacking honest folk, we might have a better chance at catching him.”

“Your comments are noted,” Baxter snaps back, but the foreman presses on.

“Why, I’ll give £25 myself,” he continues, raising an unintentional laugh from some corners of the room, “and I hope the Government will do more. The poor have souls, just like anyone else.”

“I understand,” says the coroner, struggling visibly to control himself, “that it is a matter of government policy that no rewards are offered in any case, whether the victims are rich or poor. After all,” he adds, with a sardonic little smile, “the next victim of a murder in Whitechapel may very well be rich.”

“If she is,” the foreman responds, jabbing a finger into the air, “then there’ll be a reward, that’s for sure.”

A few people in the crowd begin to clap. In his corner, wrapped in a dull mauve coat, Inspector Helson shakes his head in frustrated silence.


______________________________________________________________________________


For the rest of the day, it almost seems as if the Whitechapel streets are filled with nothing but women, hundreds of working-girls and lodging-mistresses and barmaids; surrounded by listeners, chattering away about ‘that poor Polly’ and how very well they knew her.

“Course, she was always drinking – but such a sweet dear-”

“She was in the Frying Pan right before she was killed, I saw her, spent all day there, though she didn’t have a penny to spend on her clothes-”

“They’re all talking about how it happened, but me, I know the real story-”

More than once, Wise sees a journalist slip money into a girl’s hand and lead her away down a side-street.

It’s almost dusk by the time he finds who he’s looking for – Mary Monk, an old friend of Polly’s, a stout girl in her early forties with a lazy eye and a sour grin. He’d met them together in one of the East End’s countless pubs, drinking themselves into a stupor to celebrate their escape from Lambeth workhouse.

Tonight, Mary is seated on the edge of Aldgate Pump, her stubby legs dangling over the edge of the stone steps, sucking furiously at a cigarette. She nods at Wise as she sees him approaching.

“Come to join me, have you, Tommy?” she calls.

Wise takes his place beside her, and accepts the preferred cigarette stub. It tastes foul.

“Shame about Polly,” Mary mutters, gazing down at her shoes.

“Damn shame,” says Wise, and passes the cigarette back.

They watch the carriages go rattling by; the cigarette burns down to a chalky brown stub. Mary produces rolling papers from her sleeve and begins to construct a new one.

“Saw her the night before she went,” says Mary. “She was same as ever, completely pissed, happy as could be. We were talking about saving up to go see the races, Chrissake. She didn’t even…”

She runs out of words; the little puffs of shag tobacco are shaking, in the palm of her hand. Wise remains silent, waiting for her to find her thoughts once again.

“Policemen took me in to see her,” she says. “Wanted me to identify her. They’d covered her up with a blanket, so you couldn’t see the worst of it, but her throat…her throat was all…”

Wise accepts the cigarette, and inhales.

“What gets me,” Mary continues, after a moment, “I mean, really gets me, is the bonnet. She spent all she had on the drink, she couldn’t even afford to stay at the doss-house no more, her fellas had all left her and the bastards who go with you on the street won’t pay more than threepence a fuck. But she had this…this bonnet, fancy thing, silk and lace. Kept showing it to everyone. So where’d she get it?”

Her eyes are wide, and pleading.

“Who bought her the bonnet, Tommy?” she asks. “Why ain’t they asking that?”


(A-and this is where you can ask Mary questions, if you like; I'll answer them, and collate them at the end into one post, which will also include the vote of what to do next.)
 

ironyuri

Guest
Obviously she doesn't know where she got it, but:

1. "Did Polly (Mary??) say anything about who gave her the bonnet?"
2. "Did Polly (Mary??) say where/who she got it from?"
3. "What happened to the bonnet? Do the Peelers still have it?"
 

WetWorks

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 10, 2007
Messages
3,532
Location
Facedown in the mud
Project: Eternity Codex USB, 2014
How long had she had the bonnet, was it just on her last day?

Who was her last known "fella"?
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom