Tacticular Cancer: We'll have your balls

  1. Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
    Dismiss Notice

Last movie you have seen + rating

Discussion in 'Codex Public Library' started by Rasputin, Apr 28, 2011.

  1. Juan_Carlo Arcane

    Juan_Carlo
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,911
    Click here and disable ads!
    Son of Saul :4/5:

    A holocaust film about a Jewish guy who is forced to work cleaning up after the gas chambers. He finds a boy who may or may not have been his son and becomes obsessed with trying to give him a proper Jewish burial. Wouldn't be much of a film if not for its direction, which is interesting. 95% of the film has the camera fixed on the protagonist's face or the back of his head, with really long takes and a minimal amount of cuts. The effect is clausterphobic. It's a strangely internal film, with the main character in focus the entire time. All of the atrocities and gore happen in the corners of the screen, usually out of focus. It's a neat way of breathing new life into a well trod topic.

    Sunrise (1927) :5/5:

    One of the best films I've ever seen and one of my top film going experiences. I saw it in a restored 1920s theater with live Wurlitzer accompaniment, which was totally the way this film was meant to be seen. The organist seemingly didn't use sheet music, he'd just watch the film and play what was on the screen. Which was really fascinating. Music is the emotion of a film, and having someone in the audience playing the music gave the film a live human quality which movies today just don't have (the organist would respond to the audience's reactions in subtle ways throughout, which was fun to watch). Seeing such an old film brought to life on the big screen with live music and a full audience was awesome. I'd highly recommend seeing a silent film this way some time if you ever have the opportunity.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 5
    • Salute Salute x 1
    ^ Top  
  2. Irenaeus III Unwanted Shitposter

    Unwanted
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    990
    This sounds cool, I wish I had the opportunity.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  3. Unkillable Cat Damnit Moon-Moon! Patron

    Unkillable Cat
    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    11,233
    Codex 2014
    Regarding Deadpool...part of its success is its time of release. IIRC Ryan Reynolds has been trying to get a Deadpool film going for several years now, but even if he would have succeeded earlier it wouldn't have been as big a success as it is now.

    Why? Because far too much of the film is dependant upon a 'rich soil' of superhero films to grow from - people need to be comfortable with superhero films being a thing. Then Deadpool can roll in and show us how silly these films are.
     
    ^ Top  
  4. Irenaeus III Unwanted Shitposter

    Unwanted
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    990
    Thanks makes sense. And I always hated Deadpool.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  5. Davaris Arcane

    Davaris
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2005
    Messages:
    4,900
    Location:
    Idiocracy
    Regression
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3319920/

    Ethan Hawk has made some enjoyable movies recently. This was not one of them. He was good as usual, but could not save this movie. Emma Watson should retire.
     
    ^ Top  
  6. Cyberarmy Arcane Patron

    Cyberarmy
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2013
    Messages:
    3,758
    Location:
    Smyrna - Scalanouva
    Divinity: Original Sin 2
    http://www.imdb.com/news/ni59510771...pf_rd_t=15061&pf_rd_i=homepage&ref_=hm_nw_tp2
    You should've wished something else.

    Also I rate Deadpool :4/5: too. It was entertaining though not many action scenes due to its being mostly an origin movie. Now I've high hopes for second movie.
     
    ^ Top  
  7. Trash Meep meep

    Trash
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    29,348
    Location:
    About 8 meters beneath sea level.
    Deadpool.

    Expected it to suck due to an overabundance of snarky one-liners and lame jokes. Imagine my surprise when the movie actually succeeds in being a violent comedy. Laughed out loud in the cinema. Very enjoyable romp.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  
  8. LeStryfe79 Wino Patron

    LeStryfe79
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    4,613
    Location:
    Codex 2012 Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong
    Deadpool :3/5: 1/2 . Too much nerd comedy. The tone reeked of the bad nerd comedy you find at D&D , Prog Rock, and Anime get togethers. What I eventually realized is that everyone who thinks this movie is awesome is probably a shitty story teller. Fortunately, it does enough right to be worth a shit. It's still pretty good. The acting and action were good. Some of the story and comedy worked. Unfortunately, it kind of felt like it was written by Wil Wheaton. Had that slight smell going on. Anyone who disagrees with me should wait a year and revisit it.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2016
    • Brofist Brofist x 2
    ^ Top  
  9. Melan Prestigious Gentleman Arcane Patron

    Melan
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,101
    Location:
    Civitas Quinque Ecclesiae, Hungary
    PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
    So, Out 1. So you thought Sátántangó was just too short, too mainstream, dumbed down for the instant gratification generation? Have I got a movie for you!

    Out 1, all thirteen hours of it, is one of those great white whale films that were not really seen until recently, only hinted at by the people who knew what is what. There was allegedly a screening of it in 1971 in Le Havre, once. Then another in 1991, then a few more in 2006 and 2007. Now you can buy the damn thing on DVD/Blu and watch it just like that.

    Wherever it is going, Out 1 takes its time to get there. In the first four or five hours, there doesn’t seem to be any connection or coherence among the four main plotlines. The camera spends ten, fifteen or thirty minutes exploring a scene, most of which are about two avant-garde theatre groups spending their time on endless rehearsals of two Aeschylus plays. One of them goes into meticulous focused detail about every sound and gesture, while the other tries to approach its subject through never-ending rounds of radical freeform improvisation.

    This takes up the majority of the first episodes (Out 1 is now available in a form recut into eight episodes of 70 to 110 minutes), which I swear are there to weed out the weak. There are also two parallel series of random incidents where two unrelated con artists, a deaf-mute accordion player named Colin and a petty thief named Frédérique swindle random Parisians out of their money. After a while, while the action doesn’t get any more lively, Stockholm syndrome, or perhaps sunk cost fallacy sets in, and the characters start to get rounded out enough to become interesting to follow.

    Then, the film starts to have a plot, maybe, although it could just as well be an imagined set of connections projected onto its surface by the characters or the viewer. There are hints of a secretive conspiracy of thirteen powerful people pulling the strings in the background, not so much there as somehow coalescing out of paranoid fantasies, oblique hints, awkward bits of silence and curious omissions. Out 1 is not a movie about paranoia; rather, it is a movie that is paranoia. There are things in it that may or may not be significant, and the characters may or may not be connected in ways that weren’t on screen at the beginning. But the major questions remain unanswered; the main characters invested in the central plotline, Frédérique and Colin, briefly cross paths in one scene somewhere in the middle, but never connect, or see each other again.

    Then, as some of the pieces seem to fall in their place, Out 1 takes a comfortable left turn and goes off into mindfuck territory. Was that really…? Are they, or are they not? Did she really do that? What the hell did those things signify? It is not entirely pleasant, not entirely sure what it is trying to say, and may be described a bit like Nyarlathotep slowly but meticulously devouring the second half of the plot, if it really was a plot at all. It is certainly something, even if not necessarily pleasant, or even fully coherent. It is just there with a vague sense of sadness and feeling of wrong about it, like a beached great white whale.

    And that is Out 1 in a nutshell.

    Rating: What the fuck out of -0.

    Would recommend to unaccompanied minors: only ones you don’t like.

    Goes well with:gin-tonic,bell-bottoms, iron rations

    Would, if could:Frédérique definitely, Marie or Lili yes, Sarah get the fuck away from me, whatever you are!

    Codexian? :ibelieveincleve: and :mhd: territory

    Out 1 (1971) by Jacques Rivette, starring pretty much everyone from the French New Wave and then some. 12 hours and 53 minutes, in colour.

    Pix or it didn't happen:
    Show Spoiler

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  
  10. Volourn Pretty Princess Pretty Princess

    Volourn
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    Messages:
    19,777
    Deadpool. Solid entertainment but overrated. Its tone was all over the place. The main story is rather boring and the flashbacks were too jumpy and takes you out of the movie. It would have been better if it just told the story from beginning to end the old fashion way. Saving grace was good action and mostly good acting espicially by Reynolds who saves the movie, imo. Without him, the MMA fighter, his wife, and best friend, the movie would have sucked. 6/10. Still better than the ****ty Avengers and that stupid space monkey movie avengers wannabe.

    Short version: Lestryfe is dead on.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  11. (((Crispy))) Stronger than you know Undisputed Queen of Faggotry

    (((Crispy)))
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Messages:
    10,333
    Location:
    Future Wasteland
    Okay I don't know what the fuck that post two above mine was all about but let me attempt to steer this thread back into the right direction:

    The War of the Worlds (1953)

    [​IMG]

    Many of you I'm certain remember the Tom Cruise remake of this film, and it's actually quite surprising the similarities it has to the original. Some might argue that the remake actually surpasses this one but for its time in 1953, this film was fairly well done. I think the most interesting thing about it is how dramatically the mood and scenery changes half-way through; once the original landing location of the Martians is overtaken and the cast moves into the city of Los Angeles, there really is a start contrast.

    The effects for that era were good I think. The iconic heat ray and the disintegration rays from the alien ships still look good today, but the strings holding them up are p. terribly visible. :lol:

    Held my interest the whole way through, though. Gene Barry, the film's lead, isn't overly impressive but he holds up his part well enough. The ending, like many films of this time and age, comes way too abruptly and leaves you wanting a little more.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 2
    • Fabulous Fabulous x 1
    ^ Top  
  12. Irenaeus III Unwanted Shitposter

    Unwanted
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    990
    [​IMG]

    Is that Lenin?
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  13. ghostdog Prestigious Gentleman Arcane Patron

    ghostdog
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2007
    Messages:
    8,957
    Aaaand of course there's that fucking guy that doesn't let me fully enjoy most of Truffaut's movies. I hate that fucker.

    Also no mention of *tits* is alarming. They should be a necessary ingredient to give you some incentive to keep watching.
     
    ^ Top  
  14. damager Learned

    damager
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    138
    The Revenant (2015)

    [​IMG]

    Nearly fell asleep in the theater. Unbelievable story and lot's of cringe with DiCaprio's character nearly dying 6 times in a row and surviving because he is such a hardass. If this was a Tarantino movie and the film wouldn't take itself so serious it could have been some kind of funny, but the movie takes itself dead serious. It was laughable. Also you know something is wrong when you enjoy every scene which features the villain (Hardy), an actually believable character with flaws and not an immortal, soulless saint, way more than every scene with DiCaprio. Also the movie drags on and on and on without much of a plot. One out of five, wouldn't want to see 3 hours close up shots of DiCaprio's suffering face again.

    The Hatefull Eight (2015)

    [​IMG]

    Brilliant. Loved this one. Acting was great, plot was nice and surprising. Cool action, badass characters. A Tarantino classic.

    Django Unchained (2012)

    [​IMG]

    Watched this after the hateful eight because I had so much fun. Man what a letdown. If this was a classical western it would fail. If it was a comedy it would fail. It is something in between and it failed horribly. Unbelievable characters, stupid plot and it get's even worse and worse as the movie goes on. And the movie had terrible pacing issues after a while. That said I enjoyed Christoph Waltz and Samuel L. Jackson. Their acting was good. Also nice soundtrack from Ennio Morricone. All in all a waste for this movie.

    Dead Pool (2016)

    [​IMG]

    Not much to criticize. The humor and action were good. I enjoyed the film a lot. 4th wall breaking jokes fit in nicely. I left the theater with a smile. Only 4 points because I think they could have made something more out of it. But well, maybe they left out some Dead Pool moments for the sequels. Tempted to give it a 5. Nice introduction of the character and totally worth a watch. Had a great time tonight and I hate super hero movies.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2016
    ^ Top  
  15. Volourn Pretty Princess Pretty Princess

    Volourn
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    Messages:
    19,777
    Hating two awesome movies is bullshitz. You, sir, are bullshitz.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  16. Intinium Daedalos' alt Dumbfuck Fargo Fanboy The Real Fanboy

    Intinium
    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2015
    Messages:
    1,557
    [​IMG]

    Look. Fucking look at all this hollywood superhero comic book piece of nigger shit coming out. I rest my fucking case.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  17. Jools Eater of Apples Patron

    Jools
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    8,961
    Location:
    Mêlée Island
    Codex 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2
    Someone's trying hard. Really hard.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 2
    ^ Top  
  18. Jools Eater of Apples Patron

    Jools
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    8,961
    Location:
    Mêlée Island
    Codex 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2
    [​IMG]

    The only one I'm going to watch are Deadpool and Rogue One. And the fact that I'll watch them doesn't actually mean that I am that fussed about those two.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 2
    ^ Top  
  19. Melan Prestigious Gentleman Arcane Patron

    Melan
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,101
    Location:
    Civitas Quinque Ecclesiae, Hungary
    PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
    It is Éric Rohmer in a laughably false beard, playing a Balzac scholar.

    For all the New Wave's rep for libertinism, it is surprisingly tit-free. There is one implied threesome, but nothing on screen. Some of the characters are even happily married and all that. Totally odd.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  20. Jarpie Arcane Patron

    Jarpie
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,050
    Codex 2012 MCA
    I hate most of the french new wave, fucking proto-hipster pretentious pompous "2deep4u" or artsyfartsy shit. Only "french new wave" directors I've been able stomach so far has been Louis Malle and Jean-Pierre Melville. I've only seen Elevator to the Gallows from Malle, but I've seen Bob le Flambeur, Le Samourai, L'Armée des ombres aka Army of Shadows and Le Cercle Rouge from Melville and I've loved them all.

    The best french director IMO is/was Henri-Georges Clouzot who's done three utter masterpieces: Le Corbeau, Le salaire de la peur aka The Wages of Fear and Les Diaboliques. Afaik the french new wave dismissed many of the french directors from the previous generation because they were "old fashioned" and "not with the times", or in the case of Clouzot, they didn't take his films seriously because they were "just thrillers".
     
    ^ Top  
  21. Irenaeus III Unwanted Shitposter

    Unwanted
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    990
    Yeah, the general consensus in my family is that French ((New Wave)) is dogshit.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  
  22. Jools Eater of Apples Patron

    Jools
    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    8,961
    Location:
    Mêlée Island
    Codex 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2
    Fixed that typo. :salute:
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  
  23. Irenaeus III Unwanted Shitposter

    Unwanted
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    990
    lol
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  24. Melan Prestigious Gentleman Arcane Patron

    Melan
    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    2,101
    Location:
    Civitas Quinque Ecclesiae, Hungary
    PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
    Some of the new wave directors have aged better, some worse. Everything I have seen from Godard except Contempt has been a disappointment or an outright failure. Not too thrilled about Truffaut either. I hate to say anything good about Tarantino, but Pulp Fiction/Reservoir Dogs are better than Bande a Part, which inspired them, and even Kill Bill is better than Truffaut's The Bride Wore Black, even though it is practically the same fucking story. For all their ideas, many of the NW directors don't measure up to the commercial filmmakers who inspired them.

    Rivette is different. Artsy-fartsy is a good description, but his films have an odd, dreamlike style drawn from surrealism that appeals to me, and a sense of humour that's there even in Out 1. It feels like he is not so much Making a Statement as having fun playing with the viewer's expectations, and while he is an obvious lefty, he is fundamentally good-natured and self-critical about it.

    Also, I don't know if Georges Franju counts as a member of the new wave, but Judex (an unabashedly nostalgic remake of a 1916 Louis Feuillade serial) is a masterpiece, and one of my favourite movies.
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 1
    ^ Top  
  25. Lonely Vazdru Pimp my Title

    Lonely Vazdru
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    5,848
    Location:
    Agen
    Fuck dudes, I live and I grew up in France, why do you have to bring that shit up HERE ? How do you even know about that local crap ? Sometimes you are just too monocle for your own good (and mine incidentally)
     
    • Brofist Brofist x 3
    ^ Top  

(buying stuff via the above buttons helps us pay the hosting bills, thanks!)