Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview Interview with the Tyranny Writing Team at Game Revolution

Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
3,213
Location
Vostroya
I am sure some of you are familiar with RuneQuest. Now that's a grim bronze age tech-level setting, and I can't help but see similarities with Lunar Empire and Tyranny's setup.

Now, for me, Gloranatha's design has been always above that of, say Forgotten Realms, given its unforgiving, primitive society and visceral combat. If Tyranny could capture even a little bit of that magic (or in this case the lack of it, since RQ isn't that high magic a setting), we might end up getting a decent game.
Erm. Tyranny is written for wider audience, they even hired that girl who gushes over Sherlock, Walking Dead, Fallout 4 and other assorted "tee-hee I'm soooo nerdy :wink:" shit. She isn't the sole author in this, but she can double as a focus group. Do you really think that they can write even a fraction of KoDP, for example? Or that their audience would understand and like it? The same audience, who adores Dragon Age and wants more of the same, but with more indie and nerd cred?
 

Kev Inkline

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
5,110
A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I am sure some of you are familiar with RuneQuest. Now that's a grim bronze age tech-level setting, and I can't help but see similarities with Lunar Empire and Tyranny's setup.

Now, for me, Gloranatha's design has been always above that of, say Forgotten Realms, given its unforgiving, primitive society and visceral combat. If Tyranny could capture even a little bit of that magic (or in this case the lack of it, since RQ isn't that high magic a setting), we might end up getting a decent game.
Erm. Tyranny is written for wider audience, they even hired that girl who gushes over Sherlock, Walking Dead, Fallout 4 and other assorted "tee-hee I'm soooo nerdy :wink:" shit. She isn't the sole author in this, but she can double as a focus group. Do you really think that they can write even a fraction of KoDP, for example? Or that their audience would understand and like it? The same audience, who adores Dragon Age and wants more of the same, but with more indie and nerd cred?
Yes, I do believe you have a point there, but I still have some hope. Though I must admit that I enjoyed the first DA:O when it came out, far from adoring it though. It could be my lackluster standards. It was enough to see the trailer for DA2 to not continue with the series.

Allthough more generally, I would like to point out that I do not buy the idea that deriving inspiration from pop culture would be necessarily a bad thing. All culture, nevermind whether it's classified as highbrow or lowbrow aims at entertaining its consumers (no matter what the high-brow consumers may insist), and this whole distinction seems just self-serving classfication conjured up and uphold by folks who probably are bad in natural sciences but somehow want to tell themselves that they are smart, and elevate themselves above the masses. Writing in Dark Horse comics could, in principle, be of as high quality, as say works of high-lit authors. As mentioned earlier in the thread, it's the skill of the creator that dictates the quality, not the subject matter or medium per se. The same goes for films, music etc. For instance, I can aknowledge that music by Lady Gaga has high production values and quality, and flawless execution, even if I do not like it much at all.

Though I still do not want this to reduce to some post-modern credo like 'Anything Goes'*, there's is quality differences in everything

* or its Codex parallel: everything is shit
 
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
3,213
Location
Vostroya
I am sure some of you are familiar with RuneQuest. Now that's a grim bronze age tech-level setting, and I can't help but see similarities with Lunar Empire and Tyranny's setup.

Now, for me, Gloranatha's design has been always above that of, say Forgotten Realms, given its unforgiving, primitive society and visceral combat. If Tyranny could capture even a little bit of that magic (or in this case the lack of it, since RQ isn't that high magic a setting), we might end up getting a decent game.
Erm. Tyranny is written for wider audience, they even hired that girl who gushes over Sherlock, Walking Dead, Fallout 4 and other assorted "tee-hee I'm soooo nerdy :wink:" shit. She isn't the sole author in this, but she can double as a focus group. Do you really think that they can write even a fraction of KoDP, for example? Or that their audience would understand and like it? The same audience, who adores Dragon Age and wants more of the same, but with more indie and nerd cred?
Yes, I do believe you have a point there, but I still have some hope. Though I must admit that I enjoyed the first DA:O when it came out, far from adoring it though. It could be my lackluster standards. It was enough to see the trailer for DA2 to not continue with the series.

Allthough more generally, I would like to point out that I do not buy the idea that deriving inspiration from pop culture would be necessarily a bad thing. All culture, nevermind whether it's classified as highbrow or lowbrow aims at entertaining its consumers (no matter what the high-brow consumers may insist), and this whole distinction seems just self-serving classfication conjured up and uphold by folks who probably are bad in natural sciences but somehow want to tell themselves that they are smart, and elevate themselves above the masses. Writing in Dark Horse comics could, in principle, be of as high quality, as say works of high-lit authors. As mentioned earlier in the thread, it's the skill of the creator that dictates the quality, not the subject matter or medium per se. The same goes for films, music etc. For instance, I can aknowledge that music by Lady Gaga has high production values and quality, and flawless execution, even if I do not like it much at all.

Though I still do not want this to reduce to some post-modern credo like 'Anything Goes'*, there's is quality differences in everything

* or its Codex parallel: everything is shit
Highbrow and lowbrow distinction is often based on cultural trends and meaningless at times. Fantasy, which before GoT success story was considered lowbrow genre, can, of course have multiple positive qualities, elevating it above contemporary prose. It can be psychologically valid, plot can be very intricate, it can have layers of meanings, metaphors, references. It can explore philosophical questions, play with scenarios inspired by historical periods and events and present a before unheard of point of view on them. But. There's always but.

First of all, while there are few gems in genre, most of it its accessible, fun fluff, power fantasy and whatnot. And then there tons of actual smelly shit. Not surprisingly, both fluff and even shit are often very popular, and if people don't have education and taste - they use it as baseline, and want more of the same, And so the genre stagnates and rots.

Secondly - if we're talking about both that girl and DA audience - she and an average Bioware fan often doesn't read. They consume only visual media, be it TV, comics, youtube, twitch or something similar. At most they read fanfics, and YA novels, and the novels made popular by TV adaptations. And thus they don't have baseline. They can't even compare what works and what doesn't in writing, they don't know their predecessors works, they mistake pandering to some groups as the ultimate goal, they can't conceive that someone can have a different opinion than they and can be right. Because they live in a bubble. Because millennials and GenZ not only like trendy things and ideas, they worship them. Uncritically and unconditionally. And so, to pander to them, you must push all aforementioned buttons, you must design by checklist.

Not surprisingly, the products made exclusively for them I don't enjoy. Not because I'm older, or smarter, or have better taste, no. I simply have a different mentality, and was raised on different cultural works and entertainment, which was structured and made differently. I'm also an "other" for anglo culture, and such an "other" hating whom is accepted. Granted, most can't give two shits about Russians, but I find it's very amusing that many of both regressive left and cuckservatives often can unite only on one thing - the Russian menace. My values, most of my country's values, are an anathema for regressive left. Which is ironic, given that they often proclaim themselves marxists, maoists, socialists and whatnot. And gamedev is seeded with them. For them, my country's history is on par with North Korea and Pol Pot's regime, which is ironic. So forgive me if I laugh at idea that the uniting the disorganized tribes and cultures is somehow EVUL. They should've marketed it as USSR IN BRONZE AGE!11 or something.

But fuck the cultural difference, I don't really care, I don't need pandering. But at least give me non-degenerate gameplay and story, which isn't catered exclusively to hipster crybabies, who died in DA:O on Easy (or whatever that mode was called). But I'm not the target audience, they are. So I don't really have any hope for this game.
 

a mod

Formlery Melanoma
Joined
Jul 23, 2016
Messages
1,140
Location
Aldebaron
What, including Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, Moorcock and Steven Erikson?

:whatho:

Genre fiction is not a real literature, bruh. Take off your monocle, cuz reading these works doesn't benefit you in the slightest, and it's all basically a giant time waster. Just like them videogames. :^)

Only retarts use the term genre fiction. Please kill yourself....
 

I ASK INANE QUESTIONS

ITZ NEVER STOPS COOOMING
Patron
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
318
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Only retarts use the term genre fiction. Please kill yourself....
That was sarcasm, my easily offended negro. I parroted the typical argument that you'll inevitably see in literary circles these days. You know, the same people that never acknowledged fantasy as anything other that silly manchildren things. Same arguments these people repeated for the last few decades. Thankfully, all of this bullshit has become somewhat irrelevant, because fantasy is so popular these days it's almost mainstream. Sure, It's a Don't forget to buy all these Stannis the Mannis t-shirts to show your friends that you're a geek just like them - sort of popularity, but it's better than nothing.
Doesn't do anything to make the aforementioned bullshit go away, though, so no "real" recognition for Tolkien, Lewis, Moorcock or Erikson anytime soon.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
3,213
Location
Vostroya
Fantasy, which before GoT success story was considered lowbrow genre
What, including Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, Moorcock and Steven Erikson?

:whatho:
You can just google "prominent literary critics on genre fiction" and browse some of the results.
Also, for example, James Wood:
SP: You mentioned that one of your guilty pleasures is watching mainstream TV shows. Do you also have guilty literary pleasures?

JW: I don’t really have guilty literary pleasures. I don’t know what the explanation for it is, because I certainly have literary friends who love genre fiction, whether it’s science fiction or thrillers. I never read that stuff and never did. So sometimes I think that’s just me being slightly anxious.

SP: Anxious?

JW: I put it down to a sort of literary anxiety, that I don’t have time for it.

SP: It sounds like you don’t think it’s good enough.

JW: Right, I don’t think it’s good enough, but it’s not like I’m a man without guilty pleasures. We mentioned TV — that’s certainly one. I love cars. I absolutely love cars. So I read car magazines. It’s not exactly a sin to read a car magazine, but they are what they are. It’s essentially car porn. So I’m not without guilty pleasures. I know what it means to balance the high and the low, and to be relaxed around the low.
 

Tigranes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
10,350
Fantasy has perennially been 'lowbrow' in terms of how it is treated by the industry, by literary critics, by scholars, etc.

You want to say highbrow/lowbrow is an idiotic distinction, or that fantasy should be treated differently, or that literary critics are retarded, or that you don't give a shit and you like fantasy, well OK. But that doesn't change the above.
 

Fenix

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Jul 18, 2015
Messages
6,458
Location
Russia atchoum!

Kev Inkline

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
5,110
A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Lunar Empire
What is it? Part of Tyranny setting?

Gloranatha's design
Crarification?

So, Glorantha is the world and setting for RuneQuest tabletop rpg, and also computer game King of Dragon Pass, which I believe is pretty well received at Codex. Lunar Empire is the ruling empire of Glorantha, and it's dictatorship (also called evil empire). I was just comparing it to the info we've so far received about Tyranny.

If you happen to be interested (as a fantasy world, beats Forgotten Realms in my opinion).
http://glorantha.wikia.com/wiki/Glorantha
http://glorantha.wikia.com/wiki/Lunar_Empire
 

Fenix

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Jul 18, 2015
Messages
6,458
Location
Russia atchoum!
Allthough more generally, I would like to point out that I do not buy the idea that deriving inspiration from pop culture would be necessarily a bad thing. All culture, nevermind whether it's classified as highbrow or lowbrow aims at entertaining its consumers (no matter what the high-brow consumers may insist)
I'd like you to see soviet comedy musical western A Man from Boulevard des Capucines which is fully explored that theme in approach of classical culture. If there are at least subtitles, recommend you to watch it.

Granted, most can't give two shits about Russians, but I find it's very amusing that many of both regressive left and cuckservatives often can unite only on one thing - the Russian menace.
They were fed with propaganda from birth from every iron for generations lol, there is nothing to expect from masses. Example I remember is a satirical image of propaganda in a movie They Live, also there is was like light hint at Jews lol.

What, including Tolkien, C. S. Lewis, Moorcock and Steven Erikson?
Yep. What so highbrow in it? And if CS Lewis is the one that wrote Alice in Wonderland then I'm surprised it is fantasy, but given the difference in classification between fantasy and sci-fi in former USSR and west it is understandable I guess.

You know, the same people that never acknowledged fantasy as anything other that silly manchildren things. Same arguments these people repeated for the last few decades.
But this is true. I love fantasy (actually I hate 99% of fantasy because it is utter shit but whatever) but love shouldn't distorte our understanding.

Also, for example, James Wood:
SP: You mentioned that one of your guilty pleasures is watching mainstream TV shows. Do you also have guilty literary pleasures?

JW: I don’t really have guilty literary pleasures. I don’t know what the explanation for it is, because I certainly have literary friends who love genre fiction, whether it’s science fiction or thrillers. I never read that stuff and never did. So sometimes I think that’s just me being slightly anxious.

SP: Anxious?

JW: I put it down to a sort of literary anxiety, that I don’t have time for it.

SP: It sounds like you don’t think it’s good enough.

JW: Right, I don’t think it’s good enough, but it’s not like I’m a man without guilty pleasures. We mentioned TV — that’s certainly one. I love cars. I absolutely love cars. So I read car magazines. It’s not exactly a sin to read a car magazine, but they are what they are. It’s essentially car porn. So I’m not without guilty pleasures. I know what it means to balance the high and the low, and to be relaxed around the low.
What amazing me every time I see it - he actually apologizes for the fact that he has better taste than crowd lol. This thing can be described as "antiintellectualism that already won".

If you happen to be interested
I'm mostly interested in things like Harry Harrison's West of Eden, and similiar things about prehistoric era even without sci-fi or fantasy elements.
Like detectives or just adventures of Stone Age, I remember a few of it in Soviet Children and Youth and YA literature, sadly just quite a few of it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 11, 2010
Messages
3,213
Location
Vostroya
Yep. What so highbrow in it? And if CS Lewis is the one that wrote Alice in Wonderland then I'm surprised it is fantasy, but given the difference in classification between fantasy and sci-fi in former USSR and west it is understandable I guess.
Oh mate, mate, mate. C.S. Lewis!=Lewis Carroll.
But this is true. I love fantasy (actually I hate 99% of fantasy because it is utter shit but whatever) but love shouldn't distorte our understanding.
* distort
What amazing me every time I see it - he actually apologizes for the fact that he has better taste than crowd lol. This thing can be described as "antiintellectualism that already won".
More like the mate's all being a pretentious twat. Intellectualism, my ass.
 

Fenix

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
Jul 18, 2015
Messages
6,458
Location
Russia atchoum!
Thanks, those mistakes, I'll never learn language well.
How you can differ pretentious twat from actual intellectual?
They all apologize because they fear accusations of elitism.
Usual deal in US.
 

Renegen

Arcane
Joined
Jun 5, 2011
Messages
4,062
Here is another question later on:
GR: What kind of tyrant would you be?

MacLean: I would tax/imprison/kill people for having children, using fossil fuels, and wasting resources.
(...)

:?
 

Kev Inkline

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
5,110
A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Here is another question later on:
GR: What kind of tyrant would you be?

MacLean: I would tax/imprison/kill people for having children, using fossil fuels, and wasting resources.
(...)

:?
Kill people for having chidren, not exactly the most long-lasting society, I would guess.

Well, this was a light-hearted interview, so I'll give it the benefit of the doubt, though I'd like to mention most states already tax the things he mentions.
 

Crescent Hawk

Cipher
Joined
Jul 10, 2014
Messages
645
Fantasy, Sci Fi, Magical Realism, called it whatever you want, its the realm of dreamers and visionaries. People who actually create good homebrew TT. When its good, it endures forever, when its bad its simple entertainment like everything else. Fuck the critics, lowbrow, highbrow?

Modern game dev is devoid of its grognards, of its dreamers. Its a pretty bleak landscape, only M&B and Underrail preserve some essence.

Things may change however, there is a curious resurgence of tabletop in the US and Europe (even tough Pathfinder is doing really bad). I DMed a D&D 5ed last week with the simplest of combat encounters, a bridge and two gargoyles, and so much fu shit happened that would never happen on a videogame, tha the players where were awestruck by the time it ended. The freedom it gave them changed them, they were completly crazed and hooked on it by the end of the session.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom