Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Defense of the Decline

Phineas

Educated
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
29
sser said:
This guy is an idiot. The "decline" is in the gameplay. KOTOR has tiny areas because of the gameplay designs, not because of some graphical limitations. For fuckssake, he brings up Morrowind moments after making this statement. Morrowind was a large game that could be played on the Xbox, same as KOTOR. The Xbox 360 has Oblivion, Divinity II, Risen, etc. So why is Mass Effect 2 a linear corridor with chest-high boxes everywhere? Because it's designed that way.
Click to expand...
Here's the problem with that, Divinity II & Risen are complete shit on Xbox 360; Oblivion only worked because of the loading of areas and the fact that it was designed for Xbox 360 first. The seamless design of PC games doesn't work on consoles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom