catfood
AGAIN
Hey, at least they're being honest about it.
As if you can hide anything today...
I've always said there should be room for interactive stories that aren't games. The problem comes when you label your interactive fiction as a "game", or go all hamburger hepler and insist that gameplay should be present but optional.
So "Telltale Games" should change their name to something more appropriate, since they're apparently not going to be making games anymore.
The problem comes when you label your interactive fiction as a "game"
Publisher Electronic Arts is currently under investigation by law firm Holzer Holzer and Fistel, LLC for possibly misleading investors and analysts regarding the quality of Battlefield 4, which has been plagued with problems across all platforms since it launched in late October.
Holzer Holzer and Fistel is focusing its investigation on statements made between July 24, 2013 and December 4, 2013 regarding Battlefield 4's development, sales, and impact on EA's revenue and future projects. The Atlanta-based law firm is looking into whether EA violated federal securities laws during this time by making false statements about the game's status.
The firm encourages those who purchased EA common stock between July 24 and Dec. 4 or who suffered investment losses during this year contact Holzer Holzer and Fistel attorney Marshall P. Dees regarding legal rights in this case.
Holzer Holzer and Fistel is a law firm focused on representation of shareholders and investors and investigation of SEC violations. The company currently has a number of outstanding cases, including investigations into clothing retailer Urban Oufitters, Ventrus Biosciences and Lumber Liquidators Holdings.
On Nov. 18, Battlefield's servers suffered DDOS attack, which was followed by two weeks of fixes and patches issued across all platforms to address various bugs and crashes. Last week, EA announced that it would cease work on future Battlefield 4 expansions until issues with the current state of the game have been rectified. As a result, on Dec. 6, EA's stock dropped 7.3 percent. Yesterday, DICE created a tracker page on the Battlelog forums for the top problems within the game and status updates on incoming fixes.
http://www.polygon.com/2013/12/11/5199452/lawfirm-kicks-off-investigation-into-ea-and-battlefield-4
Publisher Electronic Arts is currently under investigation by law firm Holzer Holzer and Fistel, LLC for possibly misleading investors and analysts regarding the quality of Battlefield 4, which has been plagued with problems across all platforms since it launched in late October.
Holzer Holzer and Fistel is focusing its investigation on statements made between July 24, 2013 and December 4, 2013 regarding Battlefield 4's development, sales, and impact on EA's revenue and future projects. The Atlanta-based law firm is looking into whether EA violated federal securities laws during this time by making false statements about the game's status.
The firm encourages those who purchased EA common stock between July 24 and Dec. 4 or who suffered investment losses during this year contact Holzer Holzer and Fistel attorney Marshall P. Dees regarding legal rights in this case.
Holzer Holzer and Fistel is a law firm focused on representation of shareholders and investors and investigation of SEC violations. The company currently has a number of outstanding cases, including investigations into clothing retailer Urban Oufitters, Ventrus Biosciences and Lumber Liquidators Holdings.
On Nov. 18, Battlefield's servers suffered DDOS attack, which was followed by two weeks of fixes and patches issued across all platforms to address various bugs and crashes. Last week, EA announced that it would cease work on future Battlefield 4 expansions until issues with the current state of the game have been rectified. As a result, on Dec. 6, EA's stock dropped 7.3 percent. Yesterday, DICE created a tracker page on the Battlelog forums for the top problems within the game and status updates on incoming fixes.
lulz
In case you're even remotely curious about the development of Black Isle's classic Fallout 2, you'll want to listen to this episode of the Extrasode podcast, which features an interview with Chris Avellone that is completely devoted to the subject.
It's kind of difficult to summarize the contents, but I can say Chris goes over the game's pros and cons, explains what he would have done differently now that he has much more experience, and also why ultimately overreaching with, for example, his New Reno design might not have been all that bad.
Looks nice. By the way:
http://gamebanshee.com/news/112824-chris-avellone-on-fallout-2-podcast-interview.html
In case you're even remotely curious about the development of Black Isle's classic Fallout 2, you'll want to listen to this episode of the Extrasode podcast, which features an interview with Chris Avellone that is completely devoted to the subject.
It's kind of difficult to summarize the contents, but I can say Chris goes over the game's pros and cons, explains what he would have done differently now that he has much more experience, and also why ultimately overreaching with, for example, his New Reno design might not have been all that bad.
Geez man, I almost gotThe new GameBanshee is pretty:
Seems like another cool devs group that made few cool games and make bland games with "Kinect" in title and then make crap called Walking Dead Survival Instinct.Jesse Sosa, a former employee and 10-year veteran of the studio, today wrote on Facebook that the studio "seems to have finally shut down."
Prohibiting monetization is probably a good way to ensure that let's players are actual fans and not just cunts trying to make a buck without having to work.
PEOPLE MAKE MONEY BY PLAYING VIDEO GAMESSo what's the problem? Less AAA console sales and less YouTube "celebrities" can only be a win-win.
It's a way for them to a) make more money through YouTube, b) have greater control over YouTube channels (they'll allow them to monetize in return for positive reviews), c) gave them more options to squash negative reviews.What purpose would that serve, though? Free advertising is free advertising, doesn't matter if the guy is doing it out of love for the game or because he's an interwebs celebrity. Sounds like another case of suits being a decade behind the times. "Some guy is making videos of our game? That's not how it works, tell him to stop" "But boss, people love this guy, if he praises the game we won't need to pay those journa-" "Whatever, just do it. While you're at it, call that asian kid from IGN, tell him we need at least a 9.8 this time".