Never heard this take before. What are you referring to?
Not true. It only has a few instances of such stuff. The rest is similar to BG1 writing. And combat is way better than PoE.
It had ONE transsexual. It had one instance of gamergame comment that was removed with a patch and it had a few less than stellar conversation, nothing really important.
It had: transsexuals (in a setting where the polymorph self spell would make that obsolete), significant changes to already established characters' personalities, blatant attempts to shoehorn hard-core leftist ideology in a goddamn fantasy game, etc.
As for the writing:
So, no, it did not have writing that was similar to BG1's.
It had ONE transsexual. It had one instance of gamergame comment that was removed with a patch and it had a few less than stellar conversation, nothing really important.
It had: transsexuals (in a setting where the polymorph self spell would make that obsolete), significant changes to already established characters' personalities, blatant attempts to shoehorn hard-core leftist ideology in a goddamn fantasy game, etc.
As for the writing:
So, no, it did not have writing that was similar to BG1's.
The picture you posted is not one of those, this is a goofy conversation that BG1 was full off.
It is a magical world that can have whatever. Not everyone has access to magic that permanently changes your gender (shapeshift spells even if they are permanent can be dispelled). If it can have part lion, part snake, part dragon or part bear part owl and 100 different such examples, it can have transsexuals. Don't be retarded. What was bad in that transgender case is how it was presented which was not done well. But because you have problems for them even existing means I am talking to a mindless zealot.It had ONE transsexual. It had one instance of gamergame comment that was removed with a patch and it had a few less than stellar conversation, nothing really important.
It had: transsexuals (in a setting where the polymorph self spell would make that obsolete), significant changes to already established characters' personalities, blatant attempts to shoehorn hard-core leftist ideology in a goddamn fantasy game, etc.
As for the writing:
So, no, it did not have writing that was similar to BG1's.
The picture you posted is not one of those, this is a goofy conversation that BG1 was full off.
ONE transsexual in a setting where there wouldn't be any transsexuals is one transsexual too many. Besides that and the gamergate bit, it also had: the refugee crisis commentary, changing character the writers weren't happy with (such as Safana), psychedelic Californian hippies, threatening your companion Voghiln when he calls you a wench (there's no option to take it in stride, just different shades of offendedness), and other assorted SJW-infested crap.
Also, dude, sorry, but BG1 didn't have anything like that banter.
It had its share of goofiness, yes, but nothing like this Joss Whedon-wannabe style lol-random humor.
I come to troll except when I am at war with those that wrongly think that PoE is an excellent game or when someone bashes IE games (including SoD and EE versions) or when AoD fanboys think it is better than Underrail :D
It is a magical world that can have whatever. Not everyone has access to magic that permanently changes your gender (shapeshift spells even if they are permanent can be dispelled). If it can have part lion, part snake, part dragon or part bear part owl and 100 different such examples, it can have transsexuals. Don't be retarded. What was bad in that transgender case is how it was presented which was not done well. But because you have problems for them even existing means I am talking to a mindless zealot.It had ONE transsexual. It had one instance of gamergame comment that was removed with a patch and it had a few less than stellar conversation, nothing really important.
It had: transsexuals (in a setting where the polymorph self spell would make that obsolete), significant changes to already established characters' personalities, blatant attempts to shoehorn hard-core leftist ideology in a goddamn fantasy game, etc.
As for the writing:
So, no, it did not have writing that was similar to BG1's.
The picture you posted is not one of those, this is a goofy conversation that BG1 was full off.
ONE transsexual in a setting where there wouldn't be any transsexuals is one transsexual too many. Besides that and the gamergate bit, it also had: the refugee crisis commentary, changing character the writers weren't happy with (such as Safana), psychedelic Californian hippies, threatening your companion Voghiln when he calls you a wench (there's no option to take it in stride, just different shades of offendedness), and other assorted SJW-infested crap.
Also, dude, sorry, but BG1 didn't have anything like that banter.
It had its share of goofiness, yes, but nothing like this Joss Whedon-wannabe style lol-random humor.
Gamergate thing was removed and studio owner apologized. As far as I am concerned it didn't exist. And as a person that didn't even follow the whole gamersgate war I didn't even care it was there in the first place.
Refugee crisis ingame was not a commentary on real life refugee crisis, that was just said that way by zealots like you. It was a very logical ingame result of what was happening. The game even lets you help them or chuck them all to bits with your weapons.
"Californian" hippy part is one of the bad things I was talking about so I agree there but that is a side character that many probably didn't even talk to as he does not talk to you if you ignore him.
Voghlin part was also bad and it is other bad thing I agree about, that one conversation was not done well.
So we got 2 bad short conversations and a 2 sentence conversation with transsexual that could have been done better out of 20h of gametime? Congrats zealot, you just uncovered a jew plot to rule the world!
Don't forget to put your tinfoil hat on before you leave your bunker.
Are you crazy? 1 out of 10 cursed artifacts gives the wearer a free sex change operation. The other 9 might turn you into a sentient Gelatinous Cube. If anything, that anyone cares to define 'transsexuality' is what's weird about it.
And still except for those few situation we talked about 99.9% of the game is free for whatever agenda she had. So all your got left is your zealot bullshit. Play the game first before repeating other people (wrong) words, you look like a retard.It is a magical world that can have whatever. Not everyone has access to magic that permanently changes your gender (shapeshift spells even if they are permanent can be dispelled). If it can have part lion, part snake, part dragon or part bear part owl and 100 different such examples, it can have transsexuals. Don't be retarded. What was bad in that transgender case is how it was presented which was not done well. But because you have problems for them even existing means I am talking to a mindless zealot.It had ONE transsexual. It had one instance of gamergame comment that was removed with a patch and it had a few less than stellar conversation, nothing really important.
It had: transsexuals (in a setting where the polymorph self spell would make that obsolete), significant changes to already established characters' personalities, blatant attempts to shoehorn hard-core leftist ideology in a goddamn fantasy game, etc.
As for the writing:
So, no, it did not have writing that was similar to BG1's.
The picture you posted is not one of those, this is a goofy conversation that BG1 was full off.
ONE transsexual in a setting where there wouldn't be any transsexuals is one transsexual too many. Besides that and the gamergate bit, it also had: the refugee crisis commentary, changing character the writers weren't happy with (such as Safana), psychedelic Californian hippies, threatening your companion Voghiln when he calls you a wench (there's no option to take it in stride, just different shades of offendedness), and other assorted SJW-infested crap.
Also, dude, sorry, but BG1 didn't have anything like that banter.
It had its share of goofiness, yes, but nothing like this Joss Whedon-wannabe style lol-random humor.
Gamergate thing was removed and studio owner apologized. As far as I am concerned it didn't exist. And as a person that didn't even follow the whole gamersgate war I didn't even care it was there in the first place.
Refugee crisis ingame was not a commentary on real life refugee crisis, that was just said that way by zealots like you. It was a very logical ingame result of what was happening. The game even lets you help them or chuck them all to bits with your weapons.
"Californian" hippy part is one of the bad things I was talking about so I agree there but that is a side character that many probably didn't even talk to as he does not talk to you if you ignore him.
Voghlin part was also bad and it is other bad thing I agree about, that one conversation was not done well.
So we got 2 bad short conversations and a 2 sentence conversation with transsexual that could have been done better out of 20h of gametime? Congrats zealot, you just uncovered a jew plot to rule the world!
Don't forget to put your tinfoil hat on before you leave your bunker.
And here's an excerpt from one of the writers of this masterful continuation of a classic RPG series:
It kinda looks like she has some sort of agenda she wants to push, but what would a zealot like me know, right?
And if you actually had that many you would give them. So you can go back to whatever hole you crawled under from.
Listen, I could fish out several more examples of obvious SJW-ity, but what would be the point?
You would just go: "Well, besides that, that, that, that, that, THAT and that... and maybe that, too, the game has nothing to do with SJW." :D
You like the game, we get it, fine - convince yourself that it features exemplary writing and no rabid leftist themes at all. It's yourprivilegeprerogative
Nope, the writing is worse than both BG 1, BG 2, IWD 1 and 2, they all have pretty bland fantasy writing but nothing that is offensive so you could be focused on what mattered, the combat. A game doesn't need to have good writing to be good but if the game requires you talking with NPCs that make your brain melt based on the full retardation you are witnessing, I would argue that this alone reduce the quality of the game for inducing you pain caused by the contempt you feel for who wrote that crap and knowing you paid this charlatan for it.
Most of those mods ive already played, trying different stuff now, as i mostly want to see new content, not the same old.
