Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

KickStarter BattleTech Pre-Release Thread

Vaarna_Aarne

Notorious Internet Vandal
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
34,585
Location
Cell S-004
MCA Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2
Yea HBS has a good track record when it comes to sequels (or pseudo-sequels, if one wants to define Dragonfall and Hong Kong as such), I generally expect BattleTech to be a good time (definately better than SRR anyway, SRR was in many ways a practise run) with better sequels.

Bigger question then is really if they take to feedback better with hindsight rather than kill-your-darlings approach.
 

Bohr

Arcane
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
1,878
Having said all that, I have a feeling that these changes are actually going to make the game more successful, as they probably calculated - much as we may hate that idea or spam decline smileys. Early feedback from the press seems positive, new players are interested, I think sales could be decent. And there's still (at least at first) seemingly enough complexity for the XCOM gang:

It seems like that's the idea behind it (and the excuse that gets used a lot on the forums) but I'm not sure how true it actually is. We're not talking about them following the trend of changing difficulty modes from very easy/easy/normal to normal/hard/OMFG YOU MUST BE SUPERBADASS ELITE TO PLAY THIS, we're talking about them only including the super easy mode. Would NuXCOM have sold better if it only came with the lowest difficulty level? At the very least, this is probably going to make better players bored of the game and weaken the hardcore nucleus of superfans and modders which help a game thrive.

HBS at one point thought that making mobile ports of the Shadowrun games was a good idea, but it turns out the movile market wasn't that interested in it and it only cause the engine to be limited and the UI to suck. I'm hoping this doesn't hurt them too much, but HBS does have a history of scoring own goals (lack of save system in SRR, getting rid of all but one class in Necropolis, etc.). HBS would probably be a lot better off if their fanbase vocally pointed these out, but they're usually too busy cheerleading.

Completely agree that the lack of difficulty levels is ridiculous (and obviously linked to those gamedev theories of Kiva I posted earlier, that seem rather detached from the reality of the BT franchise). I guess my point was more that some of the things I dislike and would want to mod out as soon as possible (eg getting 3 chassis pieces and they instantly turn into a new mech with full weapons loadout at no cost) don't seem to bother new players at all and mean they can dive in and start using their salvaged mechs without even mastering the mechlab to the point of building a stock mech. And there does seem to be more widespread interest in the game than I would have guessed back in the days of the KS.

Not how I would have done it - how hard would it be to add a couple of difficulty options and toggles for stuff like this? - and it does seem to be taking the hardcore fanbase for granted. The forums may have a bunch of cheerleaders but there have been a lot of threads on stuff like this and difficulty in general. Perhaps they assume that this segment will just mod the game to fully challenge themselves, but imo they should implement those difficulty toggles and ironman mode Tyler was talking about, ASAP.
 

Cael

Arcane
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Messages
20,515
Completely agree that the lack of difficulty levels is ridiculous (and obviously linked to those gamedev theories of Kiva I posted earlier, that seem rather detached from the reality of the BT franchise).
My dear fellow. The twits of this Kevin fellow indicates that he is detached from reality PERIOD. The guy is a professional victim hooked up on some extremely strong hallucinogen who should be locked up in a mental asylum somewhere before he goes out and start shooting males out of some misbegotten anger he accumulated from having a pull in front of his monitor.
 

Vaarna_Aarne

Notorious Internet Vandal
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Messages
34,585
Location
Cell S-004
MCA Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2
Having said all that, I have a feeling that these changes are actually going to make the game more successful, as they probably calculated - much as we may hate that idea or spam decline smileys. Early feedback from the press seems positive, new players are interested, I think sales could be decent. And there's still (at least at first) seemingly enough complexity for the XCOM gang:

It seems like that's the idea behind it (and the excuse that gets used a lot on the forums) but I'm not sure how true it actually is. We're not talking about them following the trend of changing difficulty modes from very easy/easy/normal to normal/hard/OMFG YOU MUST BE SUPERBADASS ELITE TO PLAY THIS, we're talking about them only including the super easy mode. Would NuXCOM have sold better if it only came with the lowest difficulty level? At the very least, this is probably going to make better players bored of the game and weaken the hardcore nucleus of superfans and modders which help a game thrive.

HBS at one point thought that making mobile ports of the Shadowrun games was a good idea, but it turns out the movile market wasn't that interested in it and it only cause the engine to be limited and the UI to suck. I'm hoping this doesn't hurt them too much, but HBS does have a history of scoring own goals (lack of save system in SRR, getting rid of all but one class in Necropolis, etc.). HBS would probably be a lot better off if their fanbase vocally pointed these out, but they're usually too busy cheerleading.

Completely agree that the lack of difficulty levels is ridiculous (and obviously linked to those gamedev theories of Kiva I posted earlier, that seem rather detached from the reality of the BT franchise). I guess my point was more that some of the things I dislike and would want to mod out as soon as possible (eg getting 3 chassis pieces and they instantly turn into a new mech with full weapons loadout at no cost) don't seem to bother new players at all and mean they can dive in and start using their salvaged mechs without even mastering the mechlab to the point of building a stock mech. And there does seem to be more widespread interest in the game than I would have guessed back in the days of the KS.

Not how I would have done it - how hard would it be to add a couple of difficulty options and toggles for stuff like this? - and it does seem to be taking the hardcore fanbase for granted. The forums may have a bunch of cheerleaders but there have been a lot of threads on stuff like this and difficulty in general. Perhaps they assume that this segment will just mod the game to fully challenge themselves, but imo they should implement those difficulty toggles and ironman mode Tyler was talking about, ASAP.
It is quite of a curious thing. You'd think you really wouldn't even need anything besides just modifiers, which shouldn't be difficult at all. It's sort of like how it's strange Stellaris doesn't have difficulty settings, even if it's possible to mod these in yourself rather easily, which again raises the question of why not when it's so easy to do (easily moddable difficulty settings is the way of the future anyway tho, IMO; that's the only way to really let the player personalize their experience to their utmost enjoyment). Ideally I think difficulty level shouldn't affect the AI, it should skew the way the variables swing.
 

Junmarko

† Cristo è Re †
Patron
Joined
Jun 20, 2011
Messages
3,480
Location
Schläfertempel

iu


:incline:
 
Last edited:

Alpharius

Scholar
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
586
It is quite of a curious thing. You'd think you really wouldn't even need anything besides just modifiers, which shouldn't be difficult at all. It's sort of like how it's strange Stellaris doesn't have difficulty settings, even if it's possible to mod these in yourself rather easily, which again raises the question of why not when it's so easy to do (easily moddable difficulty settings is the way of the future anyway tho, IMO; that's the only way to really let the player personalize their experience to their utmost enjoyment). Ideally I think difficulty level shouldn't affect the AI, it should skew the way the variables swing.
Stellaris does have difficulty settings though, and much more besides.
UI_MP_host.png
 

Bohr

Arcane
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
1,878
Dat moment when Beaglerush tries to make his "Chad" character and discovers he can have blue or purple hair, but no blonde options

:lol:
 

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,437
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
sser wants to do a review of this but it looks like we're not going to get a review key (no reply from Paradox). If anybody has a spare key they're willing to donate for the glory of the Codex, shoot me a PM.
 

fantadomat

Arcane
Edgy Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
37,163
Location
Bulgaria
Not Harebrained's fault
they forwarded my request to Paradox
Well, it seems like it's their fault. :lol:

....after I tried contacting Paradox directly first. Harebrained tried to help, it didn't work.
Are you surprised? Paradox are bunch of spineless swedish cucks,while the codex have a reputation of intolerance toward idiots like them and high tolerance toward freedom of opinions. Also their pr is terrible at best. Still,nice try mate.
 

Cael

Arcane
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Messages
20,515
Who the fuck calls missiles Smurms and Lurms?
People who don't know what LRM and SRM mean. Or the number at the end. I've met a few in my time. The lightbulb moment when they suddenly realise that SRM6 means it firsts a salvo of 6 rockets and a LRM20 fires a salvo of 20 makes me want to give them a Darwin Award. Violently.
 

agris

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
6,809
oh man, thanks. i thought it meant 6 slurms.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom