GrainWetski
Arcane
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 5,097
We're not trying to censor the industry, we're just trying to censor the industry!
"Criminal Girls"
Poe's law in action. Never underestimate SJW's idiocy BTW. Even if petition is trolling, people who signed it are serious (probably).Haha, for a moment I thought that petition was serious and was disgusted and then I realised that guy must be an internet troll, because no one can be so stupid, right ?This would be more artsy and philosophical than every indie game ever.
So much butthurt: https://www.change.org/p/destructiv...plug-on-the-hatred-game-project-and-apologize. This is the best advertisement they could get, it confirms their opinions on political correctness and censorship in game industry. I think that they are example of people that are tired by SJW bullshit and want right to make just any game they imagined (even if game will be shitty and in consequence they'll bankrupt and become hobos) without somebody trying to stop them by using law and drama.
Also, now that I know about internet trolls, I realise that such a game is a great occasion for them to troll, because it's sure that making such a petition will enrage a lot of people.
Only subhumans can post on neogaf without getting banned at some point, anyway.Maybe felipepepe could convince them to give Hatred a chance?
But spanking underage girls is sooo 1950."Criminal Girls"
Beware the horror:
Edit: Oh, it seems that the game does have BDSM mini-games.
Guess it's ok when Anna Anthropy does it.
They should put that on the box cover ... in case there will be a boxed version.Hate speech converted into a game.
This game is disgusting, it's like letting the KKK make a feature film and put it in theaters.
I don't think I've ever been more disgusted in my life. Pointless violence, entitlement, racism, misogyny, I simply cannot imagine a single way in which this game could be constructive. Video games are a relatively new medium, and are struggling to be taken seriously in the world of art. It is because of games like this. Not to mention the violence of groups like GamerGate. I am severely disappointed in everyone who had a part in making this project.
This is going to ruin gamer culture forever.
My censorship crusade begins...here.
Because this isn´t a video game anymore, it´s hatred.
This is epic fail.Because this isn´t a video game anymore, it´s hatred.
Meanwhile, Chmielarz (Painkiller and Bulletstorm) commented that he is disgusted and embarrassed by Hatred.
Killing people(in videogames) is always fun. I prefer games that do not fuck around the bush. They could tone down the edginess a bit though. Instead of an angsty edgelord monologue, better have an "average joe" silent character and let the player decide on his motives/ideology for mayhem.
I don't understand how people can like zombie games. I mean decaying walking corpses? So ugly.The funny thing is, if they were zombies everyone would be 100% okay with this.
Exactly. It's disgusting how all these shits are pretending that they aren't getting kicks from killing virtual people.Meanwhile, Chmielarz (Painkiller and Bulletstorm) commented that he is disgusted and embarrassed by Hatred.
But why? It doesn't have ludonarrative dissonance!
As for the gameplay I hope they will go for police/swat/military path after the first quick level. Other way it will get boring fast.
As for the gameplay I hope they will go for police/swat/military path after the first quick level. Other way it will get boring fast.
Hopefully civvies are the meat and potatoes of the game. They're like the lvl 1 enemy that continues to be present while difficulty ramps up, like Former Humans in Doom. After all, they still soak up bullets, they block your path, make you waste high-tier ammo which could be scarce etc. Executions are all about the visuals though, from what I understand. Not sure if giving them a gamist function, like regaining health or some shit that doesn't make sense, would be better however. I guess it could be reasonably useful as a provocation, to make cops and such jump out of cover, and as a way of dispersing other civilians which might be in the way of a real gun battle.
We'll see. Using them as a human shields would be a good option.
Of course there's GTA or some other game that lets you slaughter defenseless people but it's ok because it has a somewhat funny tone and hipsters can enjoy killing in a "sort of, like, ironic kind of way".
The funny thing is, if they were zombies everyone would be 100% okay with this.
Yeah, I made a thread about it some time ago. Basically, time limits + number-based score + bonuses for special ways of killing are a way to make a game out of a killing spree toy.Killing civilians might be a challange if they are running away/hiding and you have to kill a certain number of them (but you can't kill the ones who left the location) or kill them in a certain time.
Killing people(in videogames) is always fun. I prefer games that do not fuck around the bush. They could tone down the edginess a bit though. Instead of an angsty edgelord monologue, better have an "average joe" silent character and let the player decide on his motives/ideology for mayhem.