Tacticular Cancer: We'll have your balls

  1. Having trouble staying logged in? Note: We are rpgcodex.NET not .COM. Trying to login via .com will cause issues. Make sure you are on rpgcodex.net to login and all will be fine.

    And if the Password Recovery doesn't work (there was an error transitioning accounts during the upgrade), use the "contact us" link right down the bottom right of the forums and harass us about it. Include your account name and its e-mail address (or whatever parts of it you remember).

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Preview Ausir's Fallout: New Vegas Preview Part I

Discussion in 'RPG Codex News & Content Comments' started by VentilatorOfDoom, Aug 19, 2010.

  1. JarlFrank Великий князь Patron

    JarlFrank
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Posts:
    15,925
    Location:
    The Fourth Reich
    Click here and disable ads!
    No, not really, especially not in RPGs. Heck, or even in shooters or any games with a story. Maybe in strategy games where it's really just you vs the other armies whose moves are calculated by the CPU. In, say, Total War, you pick a nation and play against other nations that are CPU-controlled.

    But let's take an adventure game. You don't play against the CPU at all. You read dialogues and solve puzzles that the developers designed.

    So the most fitting word would be to "finish" a game.
  2. Clockwork Knight Arcane

    Clockwork Knight
    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,852
    Location:
    Fighting rats inside my anus
    I use "CPU" as "nonspecific entity that supposedly controls everything other than your character(s) in a game, including puzzles, npcs and furniture", out of habit. I forget the common meaning for that word is for bots controlled by the game.

    Also, it's a game, and games end with someone winning and someone losing, because the first beat the second. Since we play games instead of simply "going through" them, it seems like a gamey term like beat is more adequate, for coherence.

    In a single player game, that someone else would be teh evul CPU. "Finish" makes me think of something non interactive, like a book, but I also use it for games just as much, also out of habit.

    I dont have a "incorrect" word for it since I grew up hearing all sorts of terms, including something that in english is like "turning over" (because you go back to the intro screen after reaching the ending, that is, the game turns over, hur hur) and "zeroing" (because the score would eventually revert to zero after you accumulate an obscene amount of points, also used for games without a score by osmosis)

    As for "beating" adventures, it's because your objective is to reach the ending, like always (at least, an ending where you don't die horribly), despite gameplay consisting of puzzles instead of bot-mashing.

    Then again, like CreamyBlood said this is so minor and irrelevant, it's hilarious, so have some of this to lighten the mood.

(buying stuff via the above links helps us pay the hosting bills)