This thread just metamorphosized into: "I am a male ally of the feminist agenda, and if I can just call non-cucks virgins loud enough, I can finally stop creeping and hoverhanding on my feminist female allies and actually get rewarded with sex. Soon, virginity, you will be a distant memory!"
Notice, I didn’t call anybody a virgin, but now that you mention it... Let’s just say, the wingnut doth protest too much, methinks.
You're a tedious and uncreative drone who can't whistle another note, I see.
Married with adorable infant son, all documented in the photo gallery.
There is nothing modern about the concept of Amiri. The fierce barbarian warrior woman is among the oldest tropes in western literature. They’re all reflections of Penthesilea. She first shows up in epics about the Trojan war written in the 7th or 8th century BC, although she doesn’t make an in person appearance in the Iliad itself.
To call something a trope implies that it was popular at some point. Penthesilea never was. Someone did an ancient fanfic of the Iliad that shipped Achilles and the amazons of Herodotus together, and the whole sordid mess completely failed to survive in even the most fragmentary form. Doesn't sound like anyone wanted to make copies of your "oldest trope" so maybe we'll elaborate on its trailblazing status and also call it the oldest of unengaging and failed tropes?
Maybe the ancient Greeks were Marxists? I bet they read a ton of Baudrillard back then.
Your feminist History professor certainly was a Marxist. It's always obvious when the Women's Studies major is reading off the disjointed notes he scribbled in class, between fantasizing that his hairy-armpitted feminist professor would notice him and give him sex, if only he recited her precisely enough.
Oh, so according to the ancient Greeks, women were so strong that they were fought over like chattel throughout that book you mentioned uncomprehendingly as proof of grrl power. The very book itself is about men fighting over three different women, two of which were captured and made into sex slaves that became pawns in a fight between Agamemnon and Achilles. The other might have escaped your notice because she's only the main macguffin for the whole tale. But because you wrote down your professor insisting that the Iliad is proof that women are as strong as men, you needn't actually have any context or stoop to reading the book itself. Magister dixit is good enough for the lowly likes of you.
Virgil liked the idea so much that he created Camilla as a knockoff character. Can you believe the balls on that guy? I guess Virgil was a social justice warrior, too, huh?
Actually, to those who know better than you, it would be embarrassingly absurd to describe Virgil as "having balls" since Virgil was a very timid and meek man, whose lack of confidence led him to ask his friends on his death bed to go and burn his manuscript for the Aeneid, which they obviously disobeyed. He is everything that we'd consider an effeminate nu-male these days, so the appeal of a dominating woman probably did call out to his womanish heart. What's your excuse for wanting a strong woman to dominate you?
