Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Against the Chris Avellone personality cult

Neanderthal

Arcane
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
3,626
Location
Granbretan
What's even the point of this thread again?

Because criticism is a bloody good thing, and high expectations are underappreciated now, too many fan boys excusing devs and not enough players asking for better.

Sides if you've read any MCA interviews you'll see man's his own biggest critic, what we just skim over he probably obsesses about.
 

Theldaran

Liturgist
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
1,772
I only know that Durance is a well-written, interesting badass, and one of the few reasons to even consider playing PoE1.
 

Jarmaro

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Messages
1,467
Location
Lair of Despair
I mean, "bad" people IRL tend to do bad shit for three reasons: 1) because they think they're doing good

that's actually one of the most common tropes nowadays, which has no basis in reality. Even delusional people rarely ever state they were helping the old lady cross the street when they actually beat her into a bloody pulp. At best, they claim that something, even a higher power, ordered them to do so. Those people who try to put forth good intentions as a defence are actually those who aren't legally insane; meaning, they're in control of themselves, and we can relatively safely chalk that defence up to lying.
Wasn't "thinking that they're doing good" intelligent people trait? Average or stupid commonly shift blame on the victim, that they could steal something beceause it was unprotected and its owner's fault he didn't secure it, that they could rape beceause woman was wearing "slutty", it's always someone else's fault in their minds, not theirs.
 
Self-Ejected

Sacred82

Self-Ejected
Dumbfuck
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
2,957
Location
Free Village
I mean, "bad" people IRL tend to do bad shit for three reasons: 1) because they think they're doing good
that's actually one of the most common tropes nowadays, which has no basis in reality. Even delusional people rarely ever state they were helping the old lady cross the street when they actually beat her into a bloody pulp. At best, they claim that something, even a higher power, ordered them to do so. Those people who try to put forth good intentions as a defence are actually those who aren't legally insane; meaning, they're in control of themselves, and we can relatively safely chalk that defence up to lying.
Wasn't "thinking that they're doing good" intelligent people trait? Average or stupid commonly shift blame on the victim, that they could steal something beceause it was unprotected and its owner's fault he didn't secure it, that they could rape beceause woman was wearing "slutty", it's always someone else's fault in their minds, not theirs.

The average thief blames the victim for being so easy to steal from? U sure? :lol:

If there's such a thing as 'intelligent people crime', it would probably be something that happened from behind the cover of society, e.g. by abusing their powers of office. In that situation, yes, the reflexive defense mechanism to claim that you were actually acting in everyone's interests exists I would say. In this case, the 'fault' still lies with someone else (those who put those great heroes to society on trial), and they're painting themselves as the true victims at the same time. If that's a sign of intelligence or of even greater mental derangedness, that can be argued about, but a rather strong feeling of entitlement is obvious in there.
 

2house2fly

Magister
Joined
Apr 10, 2013
Messages
1,877
What's even the point of this thread again? SQWs with an axe to grind against Avellone because he's liberal?

The guy pretty much single-handedly gave us PS:T and 80% of everything worthwhile in the games to which he has seriously contributed. His portfolio includes some of THE most memorable characters in RPG history, and rarely strays into the territory of the cliche, hackneyed, or strained. The main is an absolute legend for a reason. You should be pissed at him because he wastes his talents doing contract writing for lesser writers with half his imagination.
I very much am
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom