My first thought is that some of these people might be trying to click-click-click on enemies like in a Diablo game and are wondering why their characters aren't attacking more often.
The thing is, I often have to click again either to change the target or because the fight got so clusterfucky I no longer know what's going on. Arquebus reloads are lengthy so I end up skipping most of them on accident.don't click again then
It's not very fun to constantly worry about accidently giving yourself an unfair advantage.
Modders hard at work fixing the game.
What about the women? The mystery of Pallegina has to be solved!Modders hard at work fixing the game.
Geee cutting the game in four parts is a little bit too much. Obsidian is becoming more greedy than EA. No wonder that the game have so many bugs,it is only natural when you rip out 3/4 of the game.I knew it!
Call Kotaku!!!!!!1
Oh, right. DLCs were announced before launch...
You're probably right, yeah. I do remember that the first act was satisfying at release (and still is now). It's after that xp gains were too important, which - coupled with no ability/ai enemies - resulted in a snoozefest (xp has been fixed but the impression of rolling over everything remains, and I suspect it'll be there in dadfire even after the difficulty overhaul).
I think it was because there was no scaling per se in 1.0, and certain creatures were simply a bit harder to deal with than regular humanoid enemies. Are those teleporting spectres still there in the Temple of Eothas on easy?
That's one example anyway, in most cases you have to do *something* to beat them without a KO, other than just select all and left click.
My RL friends (who played on normal, IIRC) all noted the really spiky difficulty curve between encounters.
My first thought is that some of these people might be trying to click-click-click on enemies like in a Diablo game and are wondering why their characters aren't attacking more often.
I remember someone from high school returned Baldur's Gate 2 on the same day they bought it because they couldn't figure out how to attack anyone.
You're probably right, yeah. I do remember that the first act was satisfying at release (and still is now). It's after that xp gains were too important, which - coupled with no ability/ai enemies - resulted in a snoozefest (xp has been fixed but the impression of rolling over everything remains, and I suspect it'll be there in dadfire even after the difficulty overhaul).
I think it was because there was no scaling per se in 1.0, and certain creatures were simply a bit harder to deal with than regular humanoid enemies. Are those teleporting spectres still there in the Temple of Eothas on easy?
That's one example anyway, in most cases you have to do *something* to beat them without a KO, other than just select all and left click.
My RL friends (who played on normal, IIRC) all noted the really spiky difficulty curve between encounters.
My first thought is that some of these people might be trying to click-click-click on enemies like in a Diablo game and are wondering why their characters aren't attacking more often.
I remember someone from high school returned Baldur's Gate 2 on the same day they bought it because they couldn't figure out how to attack anyone.
As for post-diablo trauma, I think Interplay marketed Icewind Dale as a diablo-like experience as well back then, didn't they ? That didn't help clear the misunderstanding.
Bringing back companions from the expansion nobody played was probably considered a bad idea
But which some people will actually play
