Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Eternity Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire Pre-Release Thread [BETA RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

Quillon

Arcane
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,214
like the Rapid Shot for Hunting Bows
Isn't that class specific? AFAIK there is no modal for attack speed that's available to every class so I don't think proficiencies will cover attack speed modal but if they will, they might be worth it. Right now I don't see much value from what Josh described.

ed: And last tumblee says "rapid shot" :P tho will it extend to other weps?
 

Sizzle

Arcane
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
2,471
He said that the proficiency (which grants the ability to use said weapons modal) is available to all classes.
 

Quillon

Arcane
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,214
Yeah but modals are only interesting to me when they increase attack speed and those modals were exclusive to classes(ranger and rogue I believe) in Pillars 1, so if I take the great sword proficiency for my barb will it have attack speed modal? If not I won't consider taking it.
 

Sizzle

Arcane
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
2,471
The Two Weapon Style, Gunner and Shot on the Run all increase speed, and those are available to everyone.

It seems like this new system will be about more than simply attack speed (though I expect some weapons, like, say, the Rapier, to have it in some way or another).
 

Quillon

Arcane
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,214
Yeah I expect the same; daggers, stilettos, bows, rapiers...but they are already fast weapons, if there won't be class specific modals like "swift aim" if every class can use every proficiency then it would be weird only allowing already fast weapons to be faster.
 
Last edited:

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,386
Location
Copenhagen
This isn't new information, Grunker asked about it long ago. I believe Josh's answer was, the lack of proficiency doesn't mean you're any worse at hitting with basic attacks, so not a disaster?

Like I said back then, that's a bit of a cop-out answer though. It's a good bet that having those toggle abilities will be superior compared to the alternative.
 
Last edited:

Quillon

Arcane
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,214


ed:

https://steemit.com/gaming/@badastroza/interesting-people-6-josh-sawyer-on-pillars-of-eternity-ii

Interesting People #6: Josh Sawyer on Pillars of Eternity II

Pillars of Eternity
set the record for crowdfunded videogames when its team of RPG veterans brought in over $4 million to fund for what promised to be the spiritual successor to Baldur’s Gate and its ilk. The game was an outstanding success, and its sequel, Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire, surpassed even this amazing funding achievement to show that the computer RPG community is still very, very much alive and well. I caught up with Pillars II’s Game Director Josh Sawyer to discuss new features, community learnings and more.

WcnVZxo.png


It's great to be talking to you about Pillars of Eternity II. Maybe we can just start off with a quick rundown from your latest update that you put out this week?

Josh: So, one of the things that has really been coming together is our combat is a lot clearer in Pillars II. One of the features that we highlighted in our update was the visual effects opacity blending. Some of the feedback we got for our combat was that the visual effects were overpowering – they would blow up the screen, they were super opaque – and so we changed how we render visual effects. We changed how we author the visual effects so that they are shorter and snappier, and then we put in that new rendering feature where as soon as you pause it lowers the opacity of everything. So overall, combining the feedback with all of the pacing changes we have made (such as the fact that it is a 5-character party now) I think that the combat is much, much easier to follow.

At the same time, overall I think that the tactical challenge in each individual combat is a lot higher. Our combats tend to be a lot more handmade – there are far, far fewer trash mobs. So I think that players are going to find that combat is easier to follow, but it is even more challenging than it was in the first game. Not in a frustrating way, but rather that the gameplay feels really good – it’s going in a good direction.

z79Wb0Q.jpg

On top of heading up Pillars I & II, Josh’s past games include Icewind Dale I & II, Fallout New Vegas, Alpha Protocol and Neverwinter Nights 2.

You mentioned that the new combat system is more challenging – is there a lot more for players of the original game to learn? And how will the learning curve be for someone who is coming to Pillars for the first time?

Josh: I think it will be easier. For one thing, we’ve planned out our tutorials much earlier. In pre-production we talked about how we have a lot of things to teach the player, what are we going to teach the player and when, and part of that also means that the content we give to the player in the early game has to be paced in such a way that we’re not forced to introduce concepts before it’s time to introduce them.

So for example, in the first hour of gameplay, unless the player really goes off the beaten path and goes looking for it, they’re not going to encounter afflictions. Afflictions are the big mass of nasty status affects which hit the player. There’s so much other stuff to learn that afflictions are just not important in the early game. So our area designers, just for the first few areas, they don’t use enemies that inflict afflictions. We’re thinking ‘if we introduce those, we have to teach it, or we run the risk that players are not going to understand it, so let’s just wait a little bit before we introduce it’. And there’s a lot of little elements like that where we think, ‘look, we’re not ready to introduce this, so don’t put that in the early game’. Of course, the player is free to explore however they want, so they can go off the beaten path and find it, and that’s OK – but we designed the core content around this idea of really trying to gently and logically introduce concepts to the player as they go.

I think that overall, the system itself is clearer, the system is more consistent, there are fewer exceptions and edge cases for the player to learn, but it still is a really deep system to learn over time. I think it’s a lot more coherent and clearer, and that newcomers are going to have an easier time understanding Deadfire than they did Pillars 1.

K4R79vg.jpg

Pillars II will see numerous improvements to the combat, both visually and functionally. View full size.

OK, that’s really good to hear. You’ve said how you took a lot of lessons from the community – is this one of those lessons?

Josh: Yeah. I mean, there are a lot of lessons we can learn from ‘the community’ – and the community is actually lots of little sub-communities. So there are people who want the ultimate challenge, where they do solo ironman, they do everything, all the bounties and dragons by themselves, and for them, they have mastered it backwards and forwards, but we can’t design the core of the game around those players. And we can’t really even design the whole game for classic hardcore players, although most of our difficulty when we’re designing is based around normal and hard. We kind of expect that to be our typical range. We have a lot of players who would expect that normal is going to be challenging but not crazy, hard is a bump up from that, and I think those really encapsulate most of our players. Then we find people who are more, “I’m new to this, give me a break” and that’s why we have easy and now we have Story Time. We introduced Story Time in Pillars 1 with patch 3.0, and this makes it super easy. And then we have Path of the Damned, but we’re not really designing around that.

When we look at the community we hear things on all sides – like “this is really easy to break” as well as “this is really hard to understand”, so we’re not making it for everybody, but for people who really want to get into the game, we try to look into ‘how can we design the game such that for our core audience and a reasonable number of outliers, like the super hardcore and the more casual players that are first coming in, how do we make the game either accessible or really challenging for them in a way that feels reasonable and doesn’t screw up the rest of the game?’. A lot of that is just reading people’s feedback and also watching people play. We get a lot of stuff out of watching people play that they don’t say. A lot of people say, “I think this” and “I think that” but when you watch how they play, sometimes how they play doesn’t match how they talk about the game. It really reveals that they don’t perceive certain things, and that our feedback needs to be better, or that the pacing needs to be superior, and stuff like that. So we learn a lot from what they say, but what we see on Twitch streams and YouTube channels reveals all that stuff.

I actually feel that I get more out of engaging with a conversation when they don’t know I’m reading or watching it. As soon as they know they’re engaging with the developer directly, well first there are tone considerations that go into it – I feel that it is more genuine and interesting when the interactions are player to player. I get a lot of that by going to the different communities and just seeing what they are talking about.

u6YjieV.jpg

On top of numerous changes and improvements, Pillars II also introduces a ship as your mobile base of operations. View full size.

How do you guys stay on top of all these learnings?

Josh: Well, one of the things we’re working on integrating now is telemetrics. So, there’s a lot of subjective stuff you can get from observing Twitch and YouTube, and while we haven’t done it in a while, we do occasionally invite people in to play the game and then we’re in another room watching the feed. You can get a lot out of that. But telemetrics allow you to sort so much data from a larger pool – it goes beyond the anecdote of an individual player’s experience and you see a lot of patterns emerge, such as things they miss, or drop, what chests they open or don’t open, what paths they take through and in what order, did they notice a secret door, where they stop, or where they die, or where they quit playing. There’s all sorts of things that we can get out of that.

It’s not something that Obsidian has a ton of experience doing, but we’re realizing increasingly that there’s a lot of data that you can’t even get through polls. Polls, in a lot of cases, involves a specific community and a very specific type of player. I remember talking to a guy who did brand management for Lucasfilm, and he said, “who would you guess is the most popular character in the prequel movies?”. And I said, “I dunno, maybe like Jango Fett or someone like that?” and he said, “it’s Jar Jar Binks.” I said, “there’s no way” but he told me that if you go online and look at forums, then the answer you’ll get is that it’s never going to be Jar Jar Binks, but when you ask people anonymously in a different context outside of a community setting, a lot of people will then go for Jar Jar – often it’s kids or people who feel intimidated by online communities.

So it’s not that that’s the case with Pillars characters or anything, but what people tend to do versus what they say, especially within a community, can be very different, and telemetrics can tell a different story. It’s not that one story is the whole picture – it’s a matter of just getting more insight into informing our understanding of how people actually use the games that we make.

POSD1ae.jpg

Pillars II will still be stacked full of the high fantasy that fans of the original love. View full size.

Sounds very interesting. On to the gameplay itself – can you please also talk about skills what you’re doing different in Deadfire that wasn’t in the original?

Josh: Well in Pillars 1, I wanted to solve a lot of problems that I saw in games that had parties. One of them is skill redundancy, where you have multiple characters that have the same skills and you’re thinking that that is just a waste of skill points, and you feel either you made a dumb character, or the companion that you have is dumb because you have overlapping skills so they don’t work, and also that some skills seem to come up in conversations and they were only for one character, and other skills were more applicable to multiple characters in a combat situation for example. So for Pillars 1 we really pared it down to a set of five skills that were useful to every character that invested in them. If you put points in Lore, you could use scrolls – it didn’t matter what your class was. If you put points in Stealth you could sneak around. If you put points in Athletics you could do a self-heal. All that felt very tight and solid, but it also did leave a lot of room for defining nuance in a character. Lore, for example, is very broad. History or metaphysics or religion are much more specific, so if you have a priest character, he could say, “well I know a lot about religion, but I’m not a historian” or “I’m a cypher and I’m interested in animancy and metaphysics” – the specificity of it allows the characters to feel a little more, well, specific and detailed and closer to a character concept and they can execute on that.

It's our responsibility to make the content really make use of all that stuff. We talked about it for a long time and the other thing that we did was we had a skill system where even if you have redundant skill overlap, other party members can contribute to the total.

tmpWOGm.jpg

The new skill system will bring opportunities for even greater scripted encounters outside of combat. View full size.

So they stack? Like if your character has x amount and a companion has x amount, the game checks against them cumulatively?

Josh: It’s not a 1:1 correlation, but it adds everyone’s together and there’s a triangular progression where they higher it gets the bigger the gaps are, but basically yeah, if you have a lot of people invested in a skill, it’s going to be a lot easier for you to make even really difficult checks. That way you can be, say, “I’m going to make a diplomacy party and I’m not dumb for doing that, I’m really just maxing that out”.

The other thing we did was to split skills into active and passive, so that for example you can have a skill like Metaphysics which has no gameplay benefit in that you can’t use it in combat, but you can use it in scripted interactions and conversations, so it’s a passive skill where the circumstance has to allow you to use it. And by separating the skills into two categories, we’re not saying to the player, “hey, invest in a skill that gives you a gameplay benefit or invest only in the roleplaying skills”. Rather, we have a pool of points for the gameplay stuff and then there’s a pool of points for the roleplaying-oriented or knowledge skills. So that sort of frees the player up to say, “OK, I don’t actually have to make this weird metagaming decision between these two things”.

YPkOkvO.jpg

Locations like this just make you want to explore Deadfire’s world all the deeper, don’t they? View full size.

One thing I’ve read about and don’t fully understand is the difference between companions and sidekicks. Can you explain that a bit more, please?

Josh: Okay – so this has come up a lot. I guess the thing is, looking back at Baldur’s Gate 2 and the variety and amount of content that each companion had was humongous. The difference between Minsc or Jaheira or Aerie or Cernd or any of these characters could be really vast, and we knew that we wanted to make more in-depth companions for Deadfire but we also wanted more variety in terms of aesthetics or race representation or class representation. So there were character concepts we had, like Edwin who is the pale elf, where we thought, “that’s a cool character, but we’re already at so many companions…” because it’s a colossal amount of work to write all of these companions. It’s a lot of effort, and so we didn’t want to over-extend ourselves. So we thought, how about we make a category of character that has a unique portrait, a unique voice set, has their own little personality quirks – but we know that they’re not going to have their own personal quest and they’re not going to have big relationship arcs.

So it’s a way for us of doing what you see in some games where there’s just some companions that don’t have as much meat to them, but by calling them sidekicks we’re letting the player know that hey, this character doesn’t have a bunch of custom content for them. They’re a cool character but if you’re putting them in the party because you want to have all this other stuff to them, well, that’s not what they’re for. That’s why we made that distinction. Some people got mad about it, but I would rather be upfront about it and tell them that we have all these companions, but then we also have all these other people who aren’t as thoroughly developed, and we’re letting you know that so you don’t feel like you’re getting ripped off or tricked or anything like that. We’re not saying, “yeah we have 12 companions” but secretly four of them don’t really have any content to them. I don’t want to do that.

That’s the whole reason for doing the sidekicks: to give you more characters to choose from, but being upfront with the player and saying, “look, if you really want companions for relationships and quests and stuff like that, these are not the characters for that”.

Well, awesome – plenty to think about and look forward to! Thanks a lot for your time, Josh.

Josh: No problem!

Visit Obsidian to learn more about Pillars of Eternity II: Deadfire as well as to back the game, and follow Josh on Twitter here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sizzle

Arcane
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
2,471
Josh Sawyer said:
Characters continue to gain access to weapon proficiencies (as a separate resource) as they gain levels.

Good. I was afraid it would take a standard level up point, which would have limited your options. This sounds better.

Josh Sawyer said:
The other thing we did was to split skills into active and passive, so that for example you can have a skill like Metaphysics which has no gameplay benefit in that you can’t use it in combat, but you can use it in scripted interactions and conversations, so it’s a passive skill where the circumstance has to allow you to use it. And by separating the skills into two categories, we’re not saying to the player, “hey, invest in a skill that gives you a gameplay benefit or invest only in the roleplaying skills”. Rather, we have a pool of points for the gameplay stuff and then there’s a pool of points for the roleplaying-oriented or knowledge skills. So that sort of frees the player up to say, “OK, I don’t actually have to make this weird metagaming decision between these two things”.

Another thing I was wondering how they would handle (having to pick between skills that you know will be useful in actual gameplay - like sneak - and between skills that are mostly about conversations/scripted interactions). This also seems like a good solution.
 

Quillon

Arcane
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,214
Another thing I was wondering how they would handle (having to pick between skills that you know will be useful in actual gameplay - like sneak - and between skills that are mostly about conversations/scripted interactions). This also seems like a good solution.

Wonder who came up with separating the resources for active-passive skills idea first? Tim? Josh? Together? Separately?

And devs this time around are saying things like; the game is awesome, gameplay is so good, graphics are superb, they are loving the game etc and we have to take their words for most of those claims atm. Either its genuine enthusiasm which is encouraging or they upped their marketing skillzzz :P
 

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,236
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Separation between "combat" and "non-combat" skills was actually something that they were talking about during the early development of PoE1, but Josh decided to make all skills useful outside of dialogue so no separation was necessary.
 

Quillon

Arcane
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,214
Well Tim presented it like it was his idea in his infamous croatia presentation.
 
Self-Ejected

Sacred82

Self-Ejected
Dumbfuck
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
2,957
Location
Free Village
Separation between "combat" and "non-combat" skills was actually something that they were talking about during the early development of PoE1, but Josh decided to make all skills useful outside of dialogue so no separation was necessary.

I remember asking for non-combat skills like alchemy, and I mentioned Darklands alchemists specifically as an example of a utility character that's weak in combat.

Still not going to be a thing with PoE I think, but it's cool that skills like alchemy will make it in.
 

Lacrymas

Arcane
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
17,949
Pathfinder: Wrath
We do have alchemy in PoE, though, just in a separate UI and everyone can do it. I use it extensively.
 
Self-Ejected

Sacred82

Self-Ejected
Dumbfuck
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
2,957
Location
Free Village
Yes. I just prefer for things like that to have some kind of trade-off - in this case, that you can't invest so much into combat skills on your skill monkey.
 

Grotesque

±¼ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Apr 16, 2012
Messages
8,987
Divinity: Original Sin Divinity: Original Sin 2
Oh my. POE internet defense force? Why can't people ever shill good games like... Galaga.

Dude... seriously. Change your avatar if you don't want to be the laughing stock around here.
Where the fuck you think you are? :)
Those Mass Effect avatars were put there as a trap for anyone foolish enough to use them, like hanging sticky fly papers on a hot summer day near a pig farm.
 

Fry

Arcane
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
1,922
https://forums.somethingawful.com/s...07509&perpage=40&pagenumber=217#post474407639

You can split up the classes into three categories, resource-wise:

* The Builders - Chanters, Ciphers, Monks: These three classes all start combat with few to no resources and have to build them up over time. Chanters use phrases over time, ciphers cause weapon damage, and monks gain wounds by taking damage. They are free to spend their built-up resources on whatever they want. While there is a max cap to these resources, they can refill to that max cap over and over again in a single encounter. More powerful abilities cost more Phrases/Focus/Wounds.

* The Common Poolers - Barbarians, Fighters, Paladins, Rangers, Rogues: These classes start each encounter with a full pool of resources that can be spent on whatever they want. Using active abilities burns down the pool. More powerful abilities cost more Rage/Discipline/Zeal/Bond/Guile.

* The Traditional Casters - Druids, Priests, Wizards: The last three classes have level-specific pools of spells that max out at 2/encounter. E.g. a single-classed level 5 character would have two 1st, two 2nd, and one 3rd level spell per encounter. These resources cannot be exchanged, so a 3rd level spell can't be sacrificed for a 2nd or 1st, so although they may use more abilities per encounter than a Common Pooler, their usage on each ability is more tightly bound.

Empower is a resource available to every character. It can be used 3 times per rest, but only once per encounter. Empower can be used to do two things: fill/restore lost resources or make a single active ability much more powerful. Clicking Empower and then clicking the character's portrait will restore about half of their maximum available resources. Clicking Empower and then an active ability will level that ability up as though you were 10 levels higher (IIRC). It makes it significantly more powerful. The effects are typically "more of" whatever the ability normally does: more damage, higher Penetration, more projectiles, more bounces, longer duration, etc.

Using Empower early in a fight can let you hit really hard or lay down a long-lasting buff, but saving the Empower until later in a fight can allow you to boost critically low resources when it really matters.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom