Jaesun
Fabulous Ex-Moderator
No, because they have to design the entire game around co-op multi-player.
This focus on big enviroments will lead to alot of trash content, can't wait to move around on big empty spaces killing cloned space mooks.
Ugh, the first thing the player said in the trailer is how he is surprised that alien plants can grow without Sun and water.
Chemosynthesis motherfucker, or try to look for artificial energy source. What kind of sci-fi protagonist ask things like this? These plants are *aliens* for a reason, so why even apply Earth-centric expectations?
I have a feeling the sci-fi will be soooo shit in this game.
GTA in Space (with tranny aliens) is probably farely accurate IMO, but it definitely won't sell 50 million copies. It probably won't even sell five million. EA is just gonna EA and churn out more garbage.I fear this will be space GTA
It's not space opera.
Space opera typically involves dozens of character WHY AM I EVEN ARGUING THIS WITH YOU? YOU KNOW THIS.
Mass Effect 1 was one of the best new works of science fiction of the last decade.
Huh? The Reapers in ME1 are Lovecraft-style elder gods. They continued that in the derelict Reaper level of ME2, but from the end of ME2 onwards they are just bad-logic, reproducing cyborgs.Mass Effect 1 was one of the best new works of science fiction of the last decade. Instead of expanding on it though 2 and 3 went with cosmic horror instead.
The Mass Effect 1 debate is as cyclical as the Reapers themselves.ME1 was the last decent game bio made so people, me included, remember it fondly.
Edit: I may be wrong but i feel the ME1 debate has happened here before.
As SCIFI RPG it hit the long dry season. Deus X, 2000, Septerrean Core, 2000 or 2001, Space Rangers (EU) 2004, KotOR, 2003 and KotOR 2 2004. Note, this is only for PC and I'm sure I forgot something, but still there weren't that much competition. I guess it might felt fresh for many players, because they weren't fans of fantasy, or Neverwinter series.Mass Effect 1 is the same old Bioware game but with a new coat of paint and better tits. There's no reason to praise it beyond that, I guess that depends on how much do you like the good old Bioware Chart.
Oh fuck no... what possible love interests... Imoen?The romance crowd has been there since Baldur's Gate 1
Oh fuck no... what possible love interests... Imoen?The romance crowd has been there since Baldur's Gate 1
I didn't visited the forum that often, guess I got lucky. Other than that, fuck this gay earth.
What you say makes perfect sense now when I think of it. So there goes my nostalgia.Oh fuck no... what possible love interests... Imoen?The romance crowd has been there since Baldur's Gate 1
I didn't visited the forum that often, guess I got lucky. Other than that, fuck this gay earth.
Yes.
And also pretty much every character. Remember the Coran and Safana quest in BG2? Coran was included because a fangirl DEMANDED his presence in the sequel. She's one of the werewolves you get to fight. You could say Bioware asked for it qhen they included the caracters who come in pairs, but they also noticed that the most popular mods were romance ones. Even back then. This is why "old Bioware was better" is not really true. If anything, the true difference between old and new Bioware only starts with Inquisition. The rest of the games all fit in the Bioware standard.
I don't really see much difference between ME1 and ME2, except the second game is a much more polished popamole experience, and has better visuals, music and characters. Both games are flawed, featuring typical black and white (blue and red) Biowareian world, mediocre story, and they are very far from the RPG genre, to be something more than just another burger for console kids.ME1 was the last decent game bio made so people, me included, remember it fondly.