Good Old Games
Donate to Codex
Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is the RPG Codex
News Content Gallery People Games Companies  
Forums About Donate RSS Contact Us!  

The Witcher interview at Rock Paper Shotgun

Visit our sponsors! (or click here and disable ads)

The Witcher interview at Rock Paper Shotgun

Interview - posted by Ausir on Thu 27 March 2008, 13:09:13

Tags: CD Projekt; Michal Madej; Witcher, The

Rock Paper Shotgun has interviewed Michal Madej of CD Projekt RED about the upcoming Enhanced Edition of The Witcher.
Was it daunting, breaking into a genre dominated by Bioware and Bethesda, and threatened somewhat by MMORPGs?

Personally I find it more motivational than daunting. It’s really fair competition and we are not “enemies” on the market, as there are very few good RPGs for players to choose from. Still, we do struggle to get the best reviews, scores and awards. I think we did really well because the genre tycoons grew a little overconfident and stuck to the old clich├ęs. We had to come up with an idea for a new, fresh and modern RPG experience that would still feel familiar to Baldur’s Gate or Elder Scrolls fans. I think we were also a little faster in noticing that to compete with the more and more popular MMOs, you must offer a completely different experience. Many single-player RPGs still contain too many gameplay elements that are simply more exciting in a multiplayer game, like money grinding and random drops. Instead we focused on elements that just don’t play an important role in MMOs – a captivating storyline, meaningful choices, character interactions and emotions.
You can read the rest of the interview here.

There are 24 comments on The Witcher interview at Rock Paper Shotgun

Blackthorne needs a kidney


TARGET: $5,000 USD

RAISED: $1,754.51 USD (35%)

Site hosted by Sorcerer's Place Link us!
Codex definition, a book manuscript.
eXTReMe Tracker
rpgcodex.net RSS Feed
This page was created in 0.0492980480194 seconds